The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multispectral and Panchromatic Data Fusion Assessment Without Reference
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces a novel approach for evaluating the quality of pansharpened multispectral (MS) imagery without resorting to reference originals. Hence, evaluations are feasible at the highest spatial resolution of the panchromatic (PAN) sensor. Wang and Bovik's image quality index (QI) provides a statistical similarity measurement between two monochrome images. The QI values between any couple of MS bands are calculated before and after fusion and used to define a measurement of spectral distortion. Analogously, QI values between each MS band and the PAN image are calculated before and after fusion to yield a measurement of spatial distortion. The rationale is that such QI values should be unchanged after fusion, i.e., when the spectral in Formation is translated from the coarse scale of the MS data to the fine scale of the PAN image. Experimental results, carried out on very high-resolution Ikonos data and simulated Pleiades data, demonstrate that the results provided by the proposed approach are consistent and in trend with analysis performed on spatially degraded data. However, the proposed method requires no reference originals and is therefore usable in all practical cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A multiscale and multidepth convolutional neural network for remote sensing imagery pan-sharpening
Yuan, Q., Wei, Y., Meng, X., Shen, H., & Zhang, L. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2018.2794888 · Cited by 649
Deep learning based multimodal biomedical data fusion: an overview and comparative review
Duan, J., Xiong, J., Li, Y., & Ding, W. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102536 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Alparone, L., Aiazzi, B., Baronti, S., Garzelli, A., Nencini, F., & Selva, M.
- Venue
- Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0099-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139529730
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.