The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy Assessment Measures for Object-based Image Segmentation Goodness
Open accessAbstract
To select an image segmentation from sets of segmentation results, measures for ranking the segmentations relative to a set of reference objects are needed. We review selected vector-based measures designed to compare the results of object-based image segmentation with sets of training objects extracted from the image of interest. We describe and compare area-based and location-based measures that measure the shape similarity between segments and training objects. By implementing the measures in two object-based image processing software packages, we illustrate their use in terms of automatically identifying parsimonious parameter combinations from arbitrarily large sets of segmentation results. The results show that the measures have divergent performance in terms of the identification of parameter combinations, Clustering of the results in measure space narrows the search. We illustrate combination schemes for the measures for generating rankings of segmentation results. The ranked segmentation results are illustrated and described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unsupervised Performance Evaluation of Image Segmentation
Chabrier, S., Emile, B., Rosenberger, C., & Laurent, H. (2006) · EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · doi:10.1155/asp/2006/96306 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Clinton, N., Holt, A., Scarborough, J., Yan, L., & Gong, P.
- Venue
- Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-299
- ISSN
- 0099-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325171775
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy Assessment Measures for Object-based Image Segmentation Goodness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14358/pers.76.3.289
- The paper
- Clinton, N., Holt, A., Scarborough, J., Yan, L., & Gong, P. (2010). Accuracy Assessment Measures for Object-based Image Segmentation Goodness. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.14358/pers.76.3.289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.