The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reactive Powder Concretes With High Ductility and 200 - 800 Mpa Compressive Strength
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Invalid Email Address
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
UHPC has ultra-high strength, high fracture toughness, and reliable durability.
“Unlike ordinary concrete, UHPC has ultr-ahigh strength, high fracture toughness, and reliable durability [7,8,9,10,11].”
From Bond-Slip Performances of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Steel Tube Columns Made of a Large-Diameter Steel Tube with Internally Welded Steel Bars (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deng, N., Zhao, H., Yao, D., & Tang, Z. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16103836 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Richard, P., & Cheyrezy, M.
- Venue
- "SP-144: Concrete Technology: Past, Present, and Future"
- Publisher
- American Concrete Institute
- Published
- 1994
- OpenAlex
- W2272957053
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- reactive powder concrete, high ductility, high compressive strength, ultra-high strength concrete, fiber-reinforced concrete
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
