The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Grenze filmen: Eine kulturwissenschaftliche Analyse audiovisueller Produktionen an den Grenzen Europas
Abstract
Welchen Beitrag können filmische Praxen und Erzeugnisse zur Reproduktion von Migrations- und Grenzregimes leisten? Ausgehend von der Annahme, dass audiovisuelle Umgebungen die Bewegungen der Migration sowohl informieren als auch formieren, analysiert Brigitta Kuster Filmklassiker ebenso wie (künstlerische) Dokumentarfilme, die meist illegale Grenzpassagen nach Europa reflektieren. Hierbei berücksichtigt sie in ihrer Studie auch das filmische Archiv rund um den durch den Film »Terminal« bekannt gewordenen Fall des Mehran Karimi Nasseri, der beinahe zwei Jahrzehnte lang auf dem Pariser Flughafen Charles de Gaulle lebte, sowie die popkulturellen und YouTube-Umgebungen der Harraga.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some videos, as Kuster (2018) also observes, include nostalgic franco/Arabic music of exile, evoking the historical passenger ships that linked Europe and Africa in colonial times.”
From Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration (2023) · cites this paper as Kuster (2018)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration
Bayramoğlu, Y. (2023) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437221136013 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuster, B.
- Venue
- Post_koloniale Medienwissenschaft
- Publisher
- transcript Verlag
- Published
- 2018-05-22
- ISSN
- 2703-1209
- 2703-1217
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- de
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review