Cited by 36Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHealthcare cost, quality, practicesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Yield of Diagnostic Tests and Its Impact on Cost in Adult Patients with Syncope Presenting to a Community Hospital

Abstract

Objectives Total annual costs for syncope-related hospitalizations were $2.4 billion in 2000. The aim of this study was to examine the type and number of tests ordered for patients admitted with syncope and whether these tests helped establish the cause. Methods We studied the records of 1038 patients coded as "syncope" in billing records, and 167 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The main outcome measures were the diagnostic yield of the ordered tests, the incremental cost/incremental benefit, and the number of admissions that can be averted if risk stratification were used in the evaluation. Results The etiology of the syncope was identified in 48.3% of the patients. Postural blood pressure measurement has the highest diagnostic yield at 58.7%, whereas history taking diagnosed 19.7% of cases. The diagnostic yields of telemetry, electrocardiogram, radionuclide stress test, echocardiography, and troponin measurement were 4.76%, 4.24%, 3.44%, 0.94%, and 0.62%, respectively. Chest x-ray, carotid ultrasonography, 24-hour Holter monitoring, brain computed tomography, and brain magnetic resonance imaging did not yield the diagnosis in any of the patients. Only 1.9% of the money spent in the evaluation of syncope was effective in leading to a definitive diagnosis. The orthostatic blood pressure measurement was ranked first in the incremental cost/incremental benefit ratio and the radionuclide stress test was ranked last (17.03 vs 42,369.0, respectively). Approximately 6% of the p…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14423/smj.0000000000000184

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 1 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kapoor, N Engl J Med, 343, 1856, 10.1056/NEJM200012213432507 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, P. C., Ammar, H., Zohdy, W., Fouda, R., & Govindu, R.
Affiliations
Cairo University (EG)
Venue
Southern Medical Journal
Published
2014-11
Volume
107
Issue
11
Pages
707-714
ISSN
0038-4348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415682417
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Southern Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
syncope, diagnostic yield, diagnostic testing costs, cost-effectiveness, unnecessary testing, risk stratification, hospitalization, adult patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Syncope, Cost of Illness, Risk Assessment, Unnecessary Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yield of Diagnostic Tests and Its Impact on Cost in Adult Patients with Syncope Presenting to a Community Hospital. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14423/smj.0000000000000184
The paper
Johnson, P. C., Ammar, H., Zohdy, W., Fouda, R., & Govindu, R. (2014). Yield of Diagnostic Tests and Its Impact on Cost in Adult Patients with Syncope Presenting to a Community Hospital. Southern Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.14423/smj.0000000000000184