Cited by 40Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Stabilization Using Flyash and GGBS in Soil Characteristics

SRM University, Kattankulathur, T.R, Oormila., Preethi, T.V.·2014·International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14445/22315381/ijett-v11p254

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
SRM University, K., T.R, O., & Preethi, T. V.
Venue
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
Published
2014-05-25
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
284-289
ISSN
2231-5381 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324522846
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
soil stabilization, fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, soil properties, geotechnical properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review