An Integrated Imbalanced Learning and Deep Neural Network Model for Insider Threat Detection
Open accessAbstract
The insider threat is a vital security problem concern in both the private and public sectors. A lot of approaches available for detecting and mitigating insider threats. However, the implementation of an effective system for insider threats detection is still a challenging task. In previous work, the Machine Learning (ML) technique was proposed in the insider threats detection domain since it has a promising solution for a better detection mechanism. Nonetheless, the (ML) techniques could be biased and less accurate when the dataset used is hugely imbalanced. Therefore, in this article, an integrated insider threat detection is named (AD-DNN), which is an integration of adaptive synthetic technique (ADASYN) sampling approach and deep neural network technique (DNN). In the proposed model (AD-DNN), the adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) is used to solve the imbalanced data issue and the deep neural network (DNN) for insider threat detection. The proposed model uses the CERT dataset for the evaluation process. The experimental results show that the proposed integrated model improves the overall detection performance of insider threats. A significant impact on the accuracy performance brings a better solution in the proposed model compared with the current insider threats detection system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CERT dataset is the most widely used and easily available synthetic dataset for evaluating insider threat detection systems.
“The most widely used and easily available synthetic dataset for evaluating an insider threat detection system is the CERT dataset [18], which has been utilized in several insider threat detection studies such as [19], [20], [21], [22] and [23].”
From Enhancing Insider Threat Detection in Imbalanced Cybersecurity Settings Using the Density-Based Local Outlier Factor Algorithm (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Al-Mhiqani, M. N., Ahmed, R., Zainal, Z., & Isnin, S. N.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (MY)
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2156-5570 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-107X
- OpenAlex
- W3128317221
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
- Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- insider threat detection, class imbalance, ADASYN, deep neural network, CERT insider threat dataset, intrusion detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review