Cited by 9

Using the monocyte activation test as a stand‐alone release test for medical devices

Brown, Jeffrey·2021·ALTEX

Abstract

Monocyte activation tests (MAT) are widely available but rarely used in place of animal-based pyrogen tests for safety assessment of medical devices. To address this issue, the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Eval­uation of Alternative Toxicological Methods and the PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. convened a workshop at the National Institutes of Health on September 18-19, 2018. Participants included representatives from MAT testing laboratories, medical device manufacturers, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radio­logic Health (CDRH), the U.S. Pharmacopeia, the International Organization for Standardization, and experts in the development of MAT protocols. Discussions covered industry experiences with the MAT, remaining challenges, and how CDRH’s Medical Device Development Tools (MDDT) Program, which qualifies tools for use in evaluating medical devices to streamline device development and regulatory evaluation, could be a pathway to qualify the use of MAT in place of the rabbit pyrogen test and the limulus amebocyte lysate test for medical device testing. Workshop outcomes and fol­low-up activities are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14573/altex.2012021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The European Pharmacopoeia included a synthetic substitute (recombinant Factor C, rFC) in 2016 and a method containing reagents deriving from human blood (Monocyte-Activation Test, MAT) in 2010.

    “However, the European Pharmacopoeia included a synthetic substitute (recombinant Factor C, rFC) in 2016 [57] and a method containing reagents deriving from human blood (Monocyte‐Activation Test, MAT) in 2010 [60].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. in vitro production of endogenous pyrogen: Comparison with limulus amebocyte lysate gelation. J Immunol Methods 52, 323-331. doi:10.1016/0022-1759(82)90004-7 · DOI
  2. EDQM (2010). General Chapter 2.6.30. Monocyte-activation test. European Pharmacopoeia.
  3. Fennrich, S., Hennig, U., Toliashvili, L. et al. (2016). More than 70 years of pyrogen detection: Current state and future perspectives. Altern Lab Anim 44, 239-253. doi:10. 1177/026119291604400305 · DOI
  4. Hartung, T., Aaberge, I., Berthold, S. et al. (2001). Novel pyro- gen tests based on the human fever reaction. Altern Lab Anim 29, 99-123. doi:10.1177/026119290102900203 · DOI
  5. Hartung, T. (2015). The human whole blood pyrogen test -Les- sons learned in twenty years. ALTEX 32, 79-100. doi:10.14573/ altex.1503241 · DOI
  6. Hasiwa, M., Kullmann, K., von Aulock, S. et al. (2007). An in vitro pyrogen safety test for immune-stimulating compo- nents on surfaces. Biomaterials 28, 1367-1375. doi:10.1016/j. biomaterials.2006.11.016 · DOI
  7. Hasiwa, N., Daneshian, M., Bruegger, P. et al. (2013). Evi- dence for the detection of non-endotoxin pyrogens by the whole blood monocyte activation test. ALTEX 30, 169-208. doi:10.14573/altex.2013.2.169 · DOI
  8. Hoffmann, S., Peterbauer, A., Schindler, S. et al. (2005). Interna- tional validation of novel pyrogen tests based on human mono- cytoid cells. J Immunol Methods 298, 161-173. doi:10.1016/j. jim.2005.01.010 · DOI
  9. Lee, D. W., Gardner, R., Porter, D. L. et al. (2014). Cur- rent concepts in the diagnosis and management of cyto- kine release syndrome. Blood 124, 188-195. doi:10.1182/ blood-2014-05-552729 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Levin, J. and Bang, F. B. (1968). Clottable protein in Limulus; its localization and kinetics of its coagulation by endotoxin. Thromb Diath Haemorrh 19, 186-197. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/5690028
  11. Mazzotti, F., Beuttler, J., Zeller, R. et al. (2007). In vitro pyrogen test -A new test method for solid medical devices. J Biomed Mater Res A 80, 276-282. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30922 · DOI
  12. Schindler, S., Spreitzer, I., Löschner, B. et al. (2006). Internati- onal validation of pyrogen tests based on cryopreserved hu- man primary blood cells. J Immunol Methods 316, 42-51. doi: References · DOI
  13. Anderson, R. L., Watson, W. H. and Chabot, C. C. (2013). Sub- lethal behavioral and physiological effects of the biomedi- cal bleeding process on the american horseshoe crab, Lim- ulus polyphemus. Biol Bull 225, 137-151. doi:10.1086/ BBLv225n3p137 · DOI
  14. Borton, L. K. and Coleman, K. P. (2018). Material-mediated py- rogens in medical devices: Applicability of the in vitro Mono- cyte Activation Test. ALTEX 35, 453-463. doi:10.14573/altex. 1709221 · DOI
  15. Cooper, J. F., Levin, J. and Wagner, H. N. (1971). Quantita- tive comparison of in vitro and in vivo methods for the detec- tion of endotoxin. Transl Res 78, 138-148. doi:10.5555/URI: PII:0022214371902113 · DOI
  16. Correa, W., Brandenburg, K., Zähringer, U. et al. (2017). Bio- physical analysis of lipopolysaccharide formulations for an understanding of the low endotoxin recovery (LER) phenome- non. Int J Mol Sci 18, 2737. doi:10.3390/ijms18122737 · DOI
  17. Davila, M. L., Riviere, I., Wang, X. et al. (2014). Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 6, 224ra25- 224ra25. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008226 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, J.
Venue
ALTEX
Publisher
ALTEX Edition
Published
2021
Pages
151-156
ISSN
1868-596X
Cited by
9
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review