Cited by 16Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsEffects of Radiation Exposure

The Role of Preclinical Models in Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

Open access
Sgouros, George, Hobbs, Robert F., Abou, Diane S.·2014·American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book

Abstract

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is a treatment modality that involves the use of radioactively labeled targeting agents to deliver a cytotoxic dose of radiation to tumor while sparing normal tissue. The biologic function of the target and the biologic action of the targeting agent is largely irrelevant as long as the targeting agent delivers cytotoxic radiation to the tumor. Preclinical RPT studies use imaging and ex vivo evaluation of radioactivity concentration in target and normal tissues to obtain biodistribution and pharmacokinetic data that can be used to evaluate radiation absorbed doses. Since the efficacy and toxicity of RPT depend on radiation absorbed dose, this quantity can be used to translate results from preclinical studies to human studies. The absorbed dose can also be used to customize therapy to account for pharmacokinetic and other differences among patients so as to deliver a prespecified absorbed dose to the tumor or to dose-limiting tissue. The combination of RPT with other agents can be investigated and optimized by identifying the effect of other agents on tumor or normal tissue radiosensitivity and also on how other agents change the absorbed dose to these tissues. RPT is a distinct therapeutic modality whose mechanism of action is well understood. Measurements can be made in preclinical models to help guide clinical implementation of RPT and optimize combination therapy using RPT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.e121

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Engineered nanoparticles with tailored surface modifications and ligands navigate biological landscapes, evade clearance mechanisms, and home in on unique cellular receptors or microenvironments in pathological tissues.

    “Engineered with tailored surface modifications and ligands for disease-specific recognition, these nanoparticles navigate biological landscapes with remarkable accuracy, evading clearance mechanisms and homing in on unique cellular receptors or microenvironments in pathological tissues [79].”

    From Radiopharmaceuticals: navigating the frontier of precision medicine and therapeutic innovation (2024) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Abstract (page not provided) describes radiolabeled ligands targeting tumor receptors and radionuclide-loaded vesicles targeting processes such as enhanced vascular permeability. It does not establish that engineered nanoparticles use tailored surface modifications to evade clearance or navigate tissues with the accuracy claimed; the pharmacokinetic discussion instead describes an antibody clearing from circulation before tumor accumulation becomes apparent. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 16

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. McBride WJ, Zanzonico P, Sharkey RM, et al. Bispecifıc antibody pre- targeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an I-124-labeled hapten-peptide. J Nucl Med. Oct 2006;47:1678-1688.
  2. Palm S, Enmon RM, Jr., Matei C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Biodistri- bution of (86)Y-Trastuzumab for (90)Y dosimetry in an ovarian carci- noma model: correlative MicroPET and MRI. J Nucl Med. 2003;44: 1148-1155.
  3. Wahl RL, Kroll S, Zasadny KR. Patient-specifıc whole-body dosimetry: principles and a simplifıed method for clinical implementation. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:14S-20S.
  4. O'Donoghue JA, Bardie `s M, Wheldon TE. Relationships between tumor size and curability for uniformly targeted therapy with beta-emitting radionuclides. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1902-1909.

Authors
Sgouros, G., Hobbs, R. F., & Abou, D. S.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book
Published
2014-05
Issue
34
Pages
e121-e125
ISSN
  • 1548-8748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8756
OpenAlex
W1982889040
Cited by
16
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
radiopharmaceutical therapy, preclinical models, tissue distribution, pharmacokinetics, absorbed dose, radiosensitivity, tumor targeting agents, combination therapy, translation to clinical trials
MeSH terms
Animals, Combined Modality Therapy, Diagnostic Imaging, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiometry, Radionuclide Imaging, Tissue Distribution, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review