Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obfuscation-Resilient Privacy Leak Detection for Mobile Apps Through Differential Analysis

Continella, Andrea, Fratantonio, Yanick, Lindorfer, Martina, Puccetti, Alessandro, Zand, Ali, Kruegel, Christopher, Vigna, Giovanni·2017·Proceedings 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium

Abstract

Author(s): Andrea Continella, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Alessandro Puccetti, Ali Zand, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna Download: Paper (PDF) Date: 27 Feb 2017 Document Type: Reports Additional Documents: Slides Video Associated Event: NDSS Symposium 2017 Abstract: Mobile apps are notorious for collecting a wealth of private information from users. Despite significant effort from the research community in developing … Continued

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14722/ndss.2017.23465

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Continella, A., Fratantonio, Y., Lindorfer, M., Puccetti, A., Zand, A., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G.
Venue
Proceedings 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
Published
2017
Cited by
90
References
36

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obfuscation-Resilient Privacy Leak Detection for Mobile Apps Through Differential Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14722/ndss.2017.23465
The paper
Continella, A., Fratantonio, Y., Lindorfer, M., Puccetti, A., Zand, A., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2017). Obfuscation-Resilient Privacy Leak Detection for Mobile Apps Through Differential Analysis. Proceedings 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2017.23465

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.