The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging
Open accessAbstract
Encryption alone is not enough for secure end-toend encrypted messaging: a server must also honestly serve public keys to users.Key transparency has been presented as an efficient solution for detecting (and hence deterring) a server that attempts to dishonestly serve keys.Key transparency involves two major components: (1) a username to public key mapping, stored and cryptographically committed to by the server, and, (2) an outof-band consistency protocol for serving short commitments to users.In the setting of real-world deployments and supporting production scale, new challenges must be considered for both of these components.We enumerate these challenges and provide solutions to address them.In particular, we design and implement a memory-optimized and privacy-preserving verifiable data structure for committing to the username to public key store.To make this implementation viable for production, we also integrate support for persistent and distributed storage.We also propose a future-facing solution, termed "compaction", as a mechanism for mitigating practical issues that arise from dealing with infinitely growing server data structures.Finally, we implement a consensusless solution that achieves the minimum requirements for a service that consistently distributes commitments for a transparency application, providing a much more efficient protocol for distributing small and consistent commitments to users.This culminates in our production-grade implementation of a key transparency system (Parakeet) which we have open-sourced, along with a demonstration of feasibility through our benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Malvai, H., Kokoris-Kogias, L., Sonnino, A., Ghosh, E., Oztürk, E., Lewi, K., & Lawlor, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT)
- Venue
- Proceedings 2023 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
- Publisher
- Internet Society
- Published
- 2023
- OpenAlex
- W4324007072
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Institute of Science and Technology Austria (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1943499)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- public key management, cryptographic commitments, distributed storage, compaction, parakeets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14722/ndss.2023.24545
- The paper
- Malvai, H., Kokoris-Kogias, L., Sonnino, A., Ghosh, E., Oztürk, E., Lewi, K., & Lawlor, S. (2023). Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging. Proceedings 2023 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2023.24545