Cited by 22Cryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging

Open access
Malvai, Harjasleen, Kokoris-Kogias, Lefteris, Sonnino, Alberto, Ghosh, Esha, Oztürk, Ercan, Lewi, Kevin, Lawlor, Sean·2023·Proceedings 2023 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium

Abstract

Encryption alone is not enough for secure end-toend encrypted messaging: a server must also honestly serve public keys to users.Key transparency has been presented as an efficient solution for detecting (and hence deterring) a server that attempts to dishonestly serve keys.Key transparency involves two major components: (1) a username to public key mapping, stored and cryptographically committed to by the server, and, (2) an outof-band consistency protocol for serving short commitments to users.In the setting of real-world deployments and supporting production scale, new challenges must be considered for both of these components.We enumerate these challenges and provide solutions to address them.In particular, we design and implement a memory-optimized and privacy-preserving verifiable data structure for committing to the username to public key store.To make this implementation viable for production, we also integrate support for persistent and distributed storage.We also propose a future-facing solution, termed "compaction", as a mechanism for mitigating practical issues that arise from dealing with infinitely growing server data structures.Finally, we implement a consensusless solution that achieves the minimum requirements for a service that consistently distributes commitments for a transparency application, providing a much more efficient protocol for distributing small and consistent commitments to users.This culminates in our production-grade implementation of a key transparency system (Parakeet) which we have open-sourced, along with a demonstration of feasibility through our benchmarks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14722/ndss.2023.24545

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 22

Metadata

Authors
Malvai, H., Kokoris-Kogias, L., Sonnino, A., Ghosh, E., Oztürk, E., Lewi, K., & Lawlor, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT)
Venue
Proceedings 2023 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
Published
2023
OpenAlex
W4324007072
Cited by
22
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Science and Technology Austria (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1943499)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
public key management, cryptographic commitments, distributed storage, compaction, parakeets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14722/ndss.2023.24545
The paper
Malvai, H., Kokoris-Kogias, L., Sonnino, A., Ghosh, E., Oztürk, E., Lewi, K., & Lawlor, S. (2023). Parakeet: Practical Key Transparency for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging. Proceedings 2023 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2023.24545