Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Merit and monetisation: A study of video game user-generated content policies

Thomas, Amy·2023·Internet Policy Review
DOI 10.14763/2023.1.1689
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14763/2023.1.1689

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Smith, Someone called ‘Let Her Solo Me’ is tricking Elden Ring players into thinking the great one has arrived, Kotaku
  2. Saab, 10 most popular gaming YouTubers, ranked By subscribers, Screen Rant
  3. Quintais, Safeguarding user freedoms in implementing Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: Recommendations from European academics, JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 10, 277
  4. Plunkett, Destiny copyright takedowns go rogue, are even hitting Bungie videos, Kotaku
  5. Mezei, End-user flexibilities in digital copyright law – An empirical analysis of end-user license agreements, IELR, 1
  6. Meese, Authors, users, and pirates: Copyright law and subjectivity, 10.7551/mitpress/9780262037440.001.0001 · DOI
  7. Marcus, Fostering creativity in virtual worlds: Easing the restrictiveness of copyright for user-created content, NYLS Law Review, 52, 67
  8. Lastowka, Copyright law and video games: A brief history of an interactive medium, SSRN Electronic Journal
  9. Lastowka, User-generated content and virtual worlds, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 10, 893
  10. Irwin, The best Cyberpunk 2077 mods, PCGamesN
  11. Gibson, Creating selves: Intellectual property and the narration of culture, 10.4324/9781315259024 · DOI
  12. Gervais, The tangled web of UGC: Making copyright sense of user-generated content, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11, 841
  13. Gandola, What is the average salary of a Twitch streamer?, Net Influencer
  14. Fowler, Third-person shooter: In-game photography is becoming an avant-garde art form, Digital Trends
  15. Fiesler, Everything I needed to know: Empirical investigations of copyright norms in fandom, IDEA – The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Centre for Intellectual Property, 59, 65
  16. Diaz, Nintendo crushes fan-favourited game music YouTube channel with thousands of copyright claims, Polygon
  17. Craig, Copyright, communication and culture: Towards a relational theory of copyright law, 10.4337/9780857933522 · DOI
  18. Ahuja, Commercial creations: The role of end user license agreements in controlling the exploitation of user generated content, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 16, 382
  19. Thomas, A question of (e)sports: An answer from copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15, 960, 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa157 · DOI
  20. LastowkaG.Minecraft as web 2.0: Amateur creativity & digital gamesAmateur media. Social, cultural and legal perspectivesRoutledge103202310.4324/9780203112021https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781136280801 · DOI
  21. Harbinja, Virtual worlds players – Consumers or citizens?, Internet Policy Review, 3, 10.14763/2014.4.329 · DOI
  22. Furgal, Memes and parasites: A discourse analysis of the copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive. CREATe working paper 2020/10, Zenodo, 1
  23. Alae-Carew, Intellectual property and “Terms of Trade”: The challenges for entertainment businesses in the emerging platform economy. CREATe research paper 2020/5, Zenodo, 1
  24. Frosio, Reforming the C-DSM reform: A user-based copyright theory for commonplace creativity, IIC, 51, 709, 10.1007/s40319-020-00931-0 · DOI
  25. Erickson, User illusion: Ideological construction of ‘user-generated content’ in the EC consultation on copyright, Internet Policy Review, 3, 10.14763/2014.4.331 · DOI
  26. DibbellJulianOwned!: Intellectual property in the age of eBayers, gold farmers, and other enemies of the virtual state or, how I learned to stop worrying and love the end-user license agreementThe state of play. Law, games, and virtual worldsNew York University Press103202310.18574/nyu/9780814739075.003.0010https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.18574/nyu/9780814739075.003.0010/html · DOI
  27. Aplin, Global mandatory fair use: The nature and scope of the right to quote copyright works, 10.1017/9781108884099 · DOI
  28. IljadicaM.User generated content and its authorsResearch handbook on intellectual property and digital technologiesEdward Elgar Publishing103202310.4337/9781785368349.00015https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785368332/9781785368332.00015.xml · DOI
  29. Deng, Players’ rights to game mods: Towards a more balanced copyright regime, Computer Law & Security Review, 43, 105634, 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105634 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, A.
Venue
Internet Policy Review
Publisher
Internet Policy Review, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
Published
2023-03-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2197-6775
DOI
10.14763/2023.1.1689
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.