The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discovering data quality rules
Abstract
Dirty data is a serious problem for businesses leading to incorrect decision making, inefficient daily operations, and ultimately wasting both time and money. Dirty data often arises when domain constraints and business rules, meant to preserve data consistency and accuracy, are enforced incompletely or not at all in application code. In this work, we propose a new data-driven tool that can be used within an organization's data quality management process to suggest possible rules, and to identify conformant and non-conformant records. Data quality rules are known to be contextual, so we focus on the discovery of context-dependent rules. Specifically, we search for conditional functional dependencies (CFDs), that is, functional dependencies that hold only over a portion of the data. The output of our tool is a set of functional dependencies together with the context in which they hold (for example, a rule that states for CS graduate courses, the course number and term functionally determines the room and instructor). Since the input to our tool will likely be a dirty database, we also search for CFDs that almost hold. We return these rules together with the non-conformant records (as these are potentially dirty records). We present effective algorithms for discovering CFDs and dirty values in a data instance. Our discovery algorithm searches for minimal CFDs among the data values and prunes redundant candidates. No universal objective measures of data quality or data quality rules are known. Hence, to avoid returning an unnecessarily large number of CFDs and only those that are most interesting, we evaluate a set of interest metrics and present comparative results using real datasets. We also present an experimental study showing the scalability of our techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Constrained frequent pattern mining: a pattern-growth view
Pei, J., & Han, J. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/568574.568580 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges
Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A., Pettit, C., Jiang, B., Haworth, J., Stein, A., et al. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.012 · Cited by 749
Holistic data cleaning: Putting violations into context
Chu, X., Ilyas, I. F., & Papotti, P. (2013) · 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde.2013.6544847 · Cited by 326
Data quality: The other face of Big Data
Saha, B., & Srivastava, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2014.6816764 · Cited by 262
Big Data Quality Framework: A Holistic Approach to Continuous Quality Management
Taleb, I., Serhani, M. A., Bouhaddioui, C., & Dssouli, R. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00468-0 · Cited by 149
IoT data cleaning techniques: A survey
Ding, X., Wang, H., Li, G., Li, H., Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Intelligent and Converged Networks · doi:10.23919/icn.2022.0026 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiang, F., & Miller, R. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1166-1177
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967167578
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovering data quality rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14778/1453856.1453980
- The paper
- Chiang, F., & Miller, R. J. (2008). Discovering data quality rules. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. https://doi.org/10.14778/1453856.1453980
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.