The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guided data repair
Abstract
In this paper we present GDR, a Guided Data Repair framework that incorporates user feedback in the cleaning process to enhance and accelerate existing automatic repair techniques while minimizing user involvement. GDR consults the user on the updates that are most likely to be beneficial in improving data quality. GDR also uses machine learning methods to identify and apply the correct updates directly to the database without the actual involvement of the user on these specific updates. To rank potential updates for consultation by the user, we first group these repairs and quantify the utility of each group using the decision-theory concept of value of information (VOI). We then apply active learning to order updates within a group based on their ability to improve the learned model. User feedback is used to repair the database and to adaptively refine the training set for the model. We empirically evaluate GDR on a real-world dataset and show significant improvement in data quality using our user guided repairing process. We also, assess the trade-off between the user efforts and the resulting data quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Data Cleaning: Overview and Emerging Challenges
Chu, X., Ilyas, I. F., Krishnan, S., & Wang, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/2882903.2912574 · Cited by 488
Self-citationBig data challenge: a data management perspective
Chen, J., Chen, Y., Du, X., Li, C., Lu, J., Zhao, S., & Zhou, X. (2013) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-013-3903-7 · Cited by 339
Holistic data cleaning: Putting violations into context
Chu, X., Ilyas, I. F., & Papotti, P. (2013) · 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde.2013.6544847 · Cited by 326
Self-citationActiveClean: interactive data cleaning for statistical modeling
Krishnan, S., Wang, J., Wu, E., Franklin, M. J., & Goldberg, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2994509.2994514 · Cited by 264
Data quality: The other face of Big Data
Saha, B., & Srivastava, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2014.6816764 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Yakout, M., Elmagarmid, A. K., Neville, J., Ouzzani, M., & Ilyas, I. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 279-289
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063103859
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guided data repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14778/1952376.1952378
- The paper
- Yakout, M., Elmagarmid, A. K., Neville, J., Ouzzani, M., & Ilyas, I. F. (2011). Guided data repair. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. https://doi.org/10.14778/1952376.1952378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.