Cited by 129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge-based trust: estimating the trustworthiness of web sources

Dong, Xin Luna, Gabrilovich, Evgeniy, Murphy, Kevin, Dang, Van, Horn, Wilko, Lugaresi, Camillo, Sun, Shaohua, Zhang, Wei·2015·Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Abstract

The quality of web sources has been traditionally evaluated using exogenous signals such as the hyperlink structure of the graph. We propose a new approach that relies on endogenous signals, namely, the correctness of factual information provided by the source. A source that has few false facts is considered to be trustworthy. The facts are automatically extracted from each source by information extraction methods commonly used to construct knowledge bases. We propose a way to distinguish errors made in the extraction process from factual errors in the web source per se, by using joint inference in a novel multi-layer probabilistic model. We call the trustworthiness score we computed Knowledge-Based Trust (KBT) . On synthetic data, we show that our method can reliably compute the true trustworthiness levels of the sources. We then apply it to a database of 2.8B facts extracted from the web, and thereby estimate the trustworthiness of 119M webpages. Manual evaluation of a subset of the results confirms the effectiveness of the method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14778/2777598.2777603

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1145/1456650.1456651 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1376616.1376746 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1145/1052934.1052942 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1277741.1277814 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/1806596.1806638 · DOI
  6. 10.14778/1920841.1921008 · DOI
  7. 10.14778/1687627.1687690 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.14778/1687627.1687691 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1145/2623330.2623623 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.14778/2732951.2732962 · DOI
  11. 10.14778/1687553.1687620 · DOI
  12. 10.14778/2535568.2448938 · DOI
  13. 10.5555/2283396.2283398 · DOI
  14. L. A. Galárraga , C. Teflioudi , K. Hose , and F. Suchanek . Amie: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases . In WWW , pages 413 -- 422 , 2013 . L. A. Galárraga, C. Teflioudi, K. Hose, and F. Suchanek. Amie: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In WWW, pages 413--422, 2013.
  15. Top 15 most popular celebrity gossip websites. http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/gossip-websites , 2014 . Top 15 most popular celebrity gossip websites. http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/gossip-websites, 2014.
  16. Z. Gyngyi , H. Garcia-Molina , and J. Pedersen . Combating web spam with TrustRank . In VLDB , pages 576 -- 587 , 2014 . Z. Gyngyi, H. Garcia-Molina, and J. Pedersen. Combating web spam with TrustRank. In VLDB, pages 576--587, 2014.
  17. 10.1145/775152.775242 · DOI · Paper page
  18. J. M. Kleinberg . Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment . In SODA , 1998 . J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In SODA, 1998.
  19. V. Krishnan and R. Raj . Web spam detection with anti-trust rank . In AIRWeb , 2006 . V. Krishnan and R. Raj. Web spam detection with anti-trust rank. In AIRWeb, 2006.
  20. 10.1145/2588555.2610509 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.14778/2535568.2448943 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/ICDE.2015.7113275 · DOI
  23. J. Pasternack and D. Roth . Knowing what to believe (when you already know something) . In COLING , pages 877 -- 885 , 2010 . J. Pasternack and D. Roth. Knowing what to believe (when you already know something). In COLING, pages 877--885, 2010.
  24. 10.5555/2283696.2283785 · DOI
  25. J. Pasternack and D. Roth . Latent credibility analysis . In WWW , 2013 . J. Pasternack and D. Roth. Latent credibility analysis. In WWW, 2013.
  26. 10.1145/2588555.2593674 · DOI
  27. A. Singh and L. Liu . TrustMe: anonymous management of trust relationshiops in decentralized P2P systems . In IEEE Intl. Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing , 2003 . A. Singh and L. Liu. TrustMe: anonymous management of trust relationshiops in decentralized P2P systems. In IEEE Intl. Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing, 2003.
  28. M. Wu and A. Marian . Corroborating answers from multiple web sources . In Proc. of the WebDB Workshop , 2007 . M. Wu and A. Marian. Corroborating answers from multiple web sources. In Proc. of the WebDB Workshop, 2007.
  29. 10.1145/1281192.1281309 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/1963405.1963439 · DOI
  31. B. Zhao and J. Han . A probabilistic model for estimating real-valued truth from conflicting sources . In QDB , 2012 . B. Zhao and J. Han. A probabilistic model for estimating real-valued truth from conflicting sources. In QDB, 2012.
  32. 10.14778/2168651.2168656 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Dong, X. L., Gabrilovich, E., Murphy, K., Dang, V., Horn, W., Lugaresi, C., Sun, S., & Zhang, W.
Venue
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Published
2015-05
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
938-949
ISSN
2150-8097
Cited by
129
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review