The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PathSim: meta path-based top-K similarity search in heterogeneous information networks
Abstract
Similarity search is a primitive operation in database and Web search engines. With the advent of large-scale heterogeneous information networks that consist of multi-typed, interconnected objects, such as the bibliographic networks and social media networks, it is important to study similarity search in such networks. Intuitively, two objects are similar if they are linked by many paths in the network. However, most existing similarity measures are defined for homogeneous networks. Different semantic meanings behind paths are not taken into consideration. Thus they cannot be directly applied to heterogeneous networks. In this paper, we study similarity search that is defined among the same type of objects in heterogeneous networks. Moreover, by considering different linkage paths in a network, one could derive various similarity semantics. Therefore, we introduce the concept of meta path-based similarity , where a meta path is a path consisting of a sequence of relations defined between different object types ( i.e. , structural paths at the meta level). No matter whether a user would like to explicitly specify a path combination given sufficient domain knowledge, or choose the best path by experimental trials, or simply provide training examples to learn it, meta path forms a common base for a network-based similarity search engine. In particular, under the meta path framework we define a novel similarity measure called PathSim that is able to find peer objects in the network ( e.g. , find authors in the similar field and with similar reputation), which turns out to be more meaningful in many scenarios compared with random-walk based similarity measures. In order to support fast online query processing for PathSim queries, we develop an efficient solution that partially materializes short meta paths and then concatenates them online to compute top- k results. Experiments on real data sets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed paradigm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/582415.582418 · Cited by 4,841
Cited by
Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001 · Cited by 6,880
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 · Cited by 3,235
Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network
Wang, X., Ji, H., Shi, C., Wang, B., Ye, Y., Cui, P., & Yu, P. S. (2019) · The World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313562 · Cited by 3,191
Self-citationHeterogeneous Graph Neural Network
Zhang, C., Song, D., Huang, C., Swami, A., & Chawla, N. V. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330961 · Cited by 1,591
Heterogeneous Graph Transformer
Hu, Z., Dong, Y., Wang, K., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380027 · Cited by 1,646
Self-citationCui, P., Wang, X., Pei, J., & Zhu, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2849727 · Cited by 1,274
Zitnik, M., Nguyen, F., Wang, B., Leskovec, J., Goldenberg, A., & Hoffman, M. M. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.012 · Cited by 675
Self-supervised Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network with Co-contrastive Learning
Wang, X., Liu, N., Han, H., & Shi, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467415 · Cited by 467
Co-author Relationship Prediction in Heterogeneous Bibliographic Networks
Sun, Y., Barber, R., Gupta, M., Aggarwal, C. C., & Han, J. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1109/asonam.2011.112 · Cited by 445
Self-citationHimmelstein, D. S., & Baranzini, S. E. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004259 · Cited by 172
A Graph-based model for context-aware recommendation using implicit feedback data
Yao, W., He, J., Huang, G., Cao, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-014-0307-z · Cited by 54
Approaches for cleaning assertion errors in knowledge graphs
Sommer, D., & Serles, U. (2026) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2026.100888
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Y., Han, J., Yan, X., Yu, P. S., & Wu, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 992-1003
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W103340358
- Cited by
- 1,870
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.