The Vadalog Parallel System: Distributed Reasoning with Datalog+/-
Abstract
Over the past years, there has been a growing demand for ontological reasoning systems based on languages of the Datalog+/- family, such as Vadalog, for their ability to effectively model a wide range of real-world problems with powerful features such as existential quantification. As the scale and complexity of data analysis tasks continue to grow, the ability to distribute the computational workload across multiple non-communicating processors has become vital for these systems to achieve scalable performance. The joint presence of existential quantification and recursion poses new challenges, currently unsolved by existing distributed systems, which only concentrate on Datalog and are therefore unsuitable for ontological reasoning. When working across multiple processors, generating all the facts to answer a specific reasoning query, avoiding duplication, and guaranteeing termination are non-trivial tasks as infinitely many new symbols and facts can be generated by existential quantification and recursion. In this paper, we address such challenges and introduce the first distributed framework in the Datalog+/- space. We propose the condition of homomorphic decomposability, which identifies sets of Datalog+/- rules with good distribution properties. We put homomorphic decomposability into action with a distributed reasoning algorithm for Warded Datalog+/-, the core of Vadalog. We implement Vadalog Parallel, a distributed reasoner for Vadalog and provide experimental evaluat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For each execution of a reasoning tool, the Vadalog engine executes the associated program and materializes the results in persistent storage, allowing the LLM to navigate and manipulate them via support tools without saturating the context window.
“For each execution of a reasoning tool , the VADALOG engine (Bellomarini et al. 2022; Bellomarini et al. 2024) executes the associated program and materializes the results in a persistent storage, allowing the LLM to navigate and manipulate them via support tools (see Step 4 of Figure 2) without saturating the context window.”
From VADAOrchestra: Neurosymbolic Orchestration of Adaptive Reasoning Workflows (2026) · cites this paper as Bellomarini et al. 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
VADAOrchestra: Neurosymbolic Orchestration of Adaptive Reasoning Workflows
Baldazzi, T., Bellomarini, L., Coletta, A., Iezzi, M., Maple, C., Pesare, A., & Sallinger, E. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.22485
“For each execution of a reasoning tool , the V ADALOG engine (Bellomarini et al. 2022; Bellomarini et al. 2024) executes the associated program and materializes the results in a persistent storage, allowing the LLM to navigate and manipulate them via support tools (see Step 4 of Figure 2) without…”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bellomarini, L., Benedetto, D., Brandetti, M., Sallinger, E., & Vlad, A.
- Affiliations
- Bank of Italy (IT)
- Roma Tre University (IT)
- TU Wien (AT)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4614-4626
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407693790
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
- Keywords
- Datalog, distributed reasoning, ontology reasoning, existential quantification, recursion, termination, scalability, parallel query processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review