Learning from Errors: A Model of Individual Processes
Open accessAbstract
Errors bear the potential to improve knowledge acquisition, provided that learners are able to deal with them in an adaptive and reflexive manner. However, learners experience a host of different—often impeding or maladaptive—emotional and motivational states in the face of academic errors. Research has made few attempts to develop a theory that focuses on learning from errors (with the exceptions of the theory of impasse-driven learning and the theory of negative knowledge) and, in particular, a theoretical framework that focuses on antecedent motivational processes. By integrating theories of self-regulated learning, volition, attributions, and appraisals, we propose a model that highlights individual processes that are characteristic of this specific learning phenomenon. More precisely, our theoretical framework aims to explain how emotional, motivational and self-regulatory processes—influenced by personal and contextual conditions—interact in order to facilitate or impede adaptive dealing with errors and appropriate metacognitions and cognitive activities. Our objective is to provide a framework that allows for the systematic integration of various aspects that have been targeted in previous research and to guide and stimulate future research on learning from errors. As a first evidence for validation, we summarise research findings that address specific parts of the proposed model.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial states are usually represented as antecedents to responses to feedback, but they also end every feedback loop, perhaps altered by the previous learning experiences.
“They are usually represented as antecedents to responses to feedback, but they also end every feedback loop, perhaps altered by the previous learning experiences (Tulis et al., 2016).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Tulis et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 135
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- De Leeuw, N., & Chi, M. T. H. (2003). Self-Explanation, enriching a situation model or repairing a domain model? In G. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change (pp. 55-78). Mahwah: New Jersey: Erlbaum.
- Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., & Schnaubert, L. (2013, August). Learning from errors through tasks-with- typical-errors. Paper presented at the 15 th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Munich, Germany.
- Mory, E. H. (1996). Feedback Research. In: D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 919-956. New York: Macmillan.
- Tulis, M., Grassinger, R., & Dresel, M. (2011). Adaptiver Umgang mit Fehlern als Aspekt der Lernmotivation und des Selbstregulierten Lernens von Overachievern [Adaptive handling of errors as an aspect of learning motivation and self-regulated learning of overachievers]. In M. Dresel & L. Lämmle (Eds.), Motivation, Selbstregulation und Leistungsexzellenz [Motivation, self-regulation and achievement excellence] (pp. 29-51). Münster, Germany: LIT.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Authors
- Tulis, M., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- Venue
- Frontline Learning Research
- Publisher
- EARLI
- Published
- 2016-07-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 12-26
- ISSN
- 2295-3159 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2491179755
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Frontline Learning Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- learning from mistakes, student self-regulation, volition, attribution theory, emotion regulation, metacognition, motivation, negative knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review