The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘These Were my Ceremonies, These my Rites’: Magical Summoning in Johannes Kepler’s Somnium
Abstract
This essay examines the relationship between supernatural motifs and scientific theories as presented in Johannes Kepler’s Somnium (1634), a work that tackles geocentrism by ironically describing the lunar-centric viewpoint held by the inhabitants of the moon. In this essay, Swinford analyses the Somnium's representation of magical summoning and travel between the moon and the earth to demonstrate the connections Kepler draws between magic and the practices of astronomical observation. The essay argues that Kepler’s complex treatment of such motifs calls for a reevaluation of the role played by medieval mysticism in the development of modern science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Swinford, D.
- Corresponding author
- Swinford, Dean
- ORCID
- Swinford, Dean
- Venue
- The Mediaeval Journal
- Publisher
- Brepols Publishers NV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-78
- ISSN
- 2033-5385 (ISSN-L)
- 2033-5393
- OpenAlex
- W2538524318
- Semantic Scholar
- 86ff11c502ed936faa8596b159217d60d7802649
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Mediaeval Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Renaissance Literature and Culture
- Keywords
- Johannes Kepler, Somnium, geocentrism, astronomical observations, medieval mysticism, early modern science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
