The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, children have been undertreated for their pain, and they continue to undergo painful cutaneous procedures without analgesics. A new topical anesthetic, liposomal lidocaine 4% cream (Maxilene, RGR Pharma, Windsor, Ont.), has become available. It has pharmacologic properties that are superior to other topical anesthetics, including an onset of action of only 30 minutes. We sought to determine the success rate of cannulation, analgesic effectiveness, procedure duration and rate of adverse skin reactions when liposomal lidocaine is used before intravenous cannulation of children. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, children aged 1 month to 17 years received liposomal lidocaine or placebo before cannulation. Success on first cannulation attempt was recorded, and, among children 5 years and older, pain was evaluated before and after the attempt by the child, parents and research assistant using a validated measure (Faces Pain Scale-Revised). For children younger than 5 years, pain was evaluated by the parents and research assistant only. The total duration of the procedure and adverse skin reactions were also recorded. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ (p > 0.05) between children who received liposomal lidocaine (n = 69) and those who received placebo (n = 73). Cannulation on the first attempt was achieved in 74% of children who received liposomal lidocaine compared with 55% of those who received placebo (p = 0.03). Among children 5 years of age and older (n = 67), lower mean pain scores during cannulation were reported by those receiving liposomal lidocaine (p = 0.01). Similarly, lower mean pain scores during cannulation were reported by the parents and research assistant for all children who received liposomal lidocaine than for all those who received placebo (p < 0.001). The mean total procedure duration was shorter with liposomal lidocaine (6.7 v. 8.5 minutes; p = 0.04). The incidence of transient dermal changes was 23% in both groups (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Use of liposomal lidocaine was associated with a higher intravenous cannulation success rate, less pain, shorter total procedure time and minor dermal changes among children undergoing cannulation. Its routine use for painful cutaneous procedures should be considered whenever feasible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microneedles: A New Frontier in Nanomedicine Delivery
Larrañeta, E., McCrudden, M. T. C., Courtenay, A. J., & Donnelly, R. F. (2016) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-016-1885-5 · Cited by 339
Failed attempts and improvement strategies in peripheral intravenous catheterization
Sabri, A., Szalas, J., Holmes, K. S., Labib, L., & Mussivand, T. (2013) · Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering · doi:10.3233/bme-120735 · Cited by 146
Peripheral Difficult Venous Access in Children
Rauch, D., Dowd, D., Eldridge, D., Mace, S., Schears, G., & Yen, K. (2009) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922809335737 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Taddio, A.
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2005-06-21
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1691-1695
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- OpenAlex
- W2015366213
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.045316
- The paper
- Taddio, A. (2005). Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.045316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.