Cited by 719Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeurological Complications and SyndromesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis

Open access
Cnossen, J. S., Morris, R. K., ter Riet, G., Mol, B. W.J., van der Post, J. A.M., Coomarasamy, A., Zwinderman, A. H., Robson, S. C. +3 more·2008·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alterations in waveforms in the uterine artery are associated with the development of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. We investigated the predictive accuracy of all uterine artery Doppler indices for both conditions in the first and second trimesters. METHODS: We identified relevant studies through searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Medion databases (all records to April 2006) and by checking bibliographies of identified studies and consulting with experts. Four of us independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed study validity. We performed a bivariable meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity and calculated likelihood ratios. RESULTS: We identified 74 studies of pre-eclampsia (total 79,547 patients) and 61 studies of intrauterine growth restriction (total 41 131 patients). Uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography provided a more accurate prediction when performed in the second trimester than in the first-trimester. Most Doppler indices had poor predictive characteristics, but this varied with patient risk and outcome severity. An increased pulsatility index with notching was the best predictor of pre-eclampsia (positive likelihood ratio 21.0 among high-risk patients and 7.5 among low-risk patients). It was also the best predictor of overall (positive likelihood ratio 9.1) and severe (positive likelihood ratio 14.6) intrauterine growth restriction among low-risk patients. INTERPRETATION: Abnormal uterine artery waveforms are a better predictor of pre-eclampsia than of intrauterine growth restriction. A pulsatility index, alone or combined with notching, is the most predictive Doppler index. These indices should be used in clinical practice. Future research should also concentrate on combining uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography with other tests.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.070430

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 719

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005;365:785-99.

Authors
Cnossen, J. S., Morris, R. K., ter Riet, G., Mol, B. W. J., van der Post, J. A. M., Coomarasamy, A., Zwinderman, A. H., Robson, S. C., Bindels, P. J. E., Kleijnen, J., & Khan, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2008-03-11
Volume
178
Issue
6
Pages
701-711
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2129376438
Cited by
719
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 48
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Wellbeing of Women
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, pulsatility index, uterine artery notching, prediction accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, first trimester, second trimester, high-risk pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Arteries, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Pre-Eclampsia, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pulsatile Flow, Sensitivity and Specificity, Uterus, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Risk Assessment, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Placental Circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review