Risk of development of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is generally appreciated that gestational diabetes is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. However, the precise relation between these 2 conditions remains unknown. We sought to determine the incidence of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes. METHODS: We used a population-based database to identify all deliveries in the province of Ontario over the 7-year period from Apr. 1, 1995, to Mar. 31, 2002. We linked these births to mothers who had been given a diagnosis of gestational diabetes through another administrative database that records people with diabetes on the basis of either physician service claims or hospital admission records. We examined database records for these women from the time of delivery until Mar. 31, 2004, a total of 9 years. We determined the presence of diabetes mellitus according to a validated administrative database definition for this condition. RESULTS: We identified 659 164 pregnant women who had no pre-existing diabetes. Of these, 21 823 women (3.3%) had a diagnosis of gestational diabetes. The incidence of gestational diabetes rose significantly over the 9-year study period, from 3.2% in 1995 to 3.6% in 2001 (p < 0.001). The probability of diabetes developing after gestational diabetes was 3.7% at 9 months after delivery and 18.9% at 9 years after delivery. After adjustment for age, urban or rural residence, neighbourhood income quintile, whether the woman had a previous pregnancy, whether the woman had hypertension after the index delivery, and primary care level before the index delivery, the most significant risk factor for diabetes was having had gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy (hazard ratio 37.28, 95% confidence interval 34.99-40.88; p < 0.001). Age, urban residence and lower income were also important factors. When analyzed by year of delivery, the rate of development of diabetes was higher among the latest subcohort of women with gestational diabetes (delivery during 1999-2001) than among the earliest subcohort (delivery during 1995 or 1996) (16% by 4.7 years after delivery v. 16% by 9.0 years). INTERPRETATION: In this large population-based study, the rate of development of diabetes after gestational diabetes increased over time and was almost 20% by 9 years. This estimate should be used by clinicians to assist in their counselling of pregnant women and by policy-makers to target these women for screening and prevention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women with gestational diabetes mellitus have a greater risk of type 2 diabetes as they age.
“albeit with a greater risk of T2D [56,57,58]”
From Recent Experimental Studies of Maternal Obesity, Diabetes during Pregnancy and the Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [57]
Women with gestational diabetes have been suggested to have a 20%-60% risk of developing diabetes 5 to 10 years after pregnancy.
“For comparison, women with gestational diabetes have been suggested to have a 20%–60% risk of developing diabetes 5 to 10 years after pregnancy.20–22”
From Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development (2012) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 440
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Damm P. Diabetes following gestational diabetes mellitus. In: Dornhorst A, Hadden DR, editors. Diabetes and pregnancy. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 1996. p. 341-50.
- Authors
- Feig, D. S., Zinman, B., Wang, X., & Hux, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Impact Inc.
- Published
- 2008-07-29
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-234
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- PMC
- PMC2474881
- OpenAlex
- W2100574091
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 28.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
- Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, diabetes incidence, postpartum diabetes risk, incidence trends, risk factors, maternal age, urban residence, neighborhood income, administrative health data linkage, Ontario Cancer Registry
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Ontario, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Diabetes, Gestational, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review