The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosed hypertension in Canada: incidence, prevalence and associated mortality
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Our objectives were to examine the prevalence and incidence of diagnosed hypertension in Canada and compare mortality among people with and without diagnosed hypertension. METHODS: We obtained data from linked health administrative databases from each province and territory for adults aged 20 years and older. We used a validated case definition to identify people with hypertension diagnosed between 1998/99 and 2007/08. We excluded pregnant women from the analysis. RESULTS: This retrospective population-based study included more than 26 million people. In 2007/08, about 6 million adults (23.0%) were living with diagnosed hypertension and about 418,000 had a new diagnosis. The age-standardized prevalence increased significantly from 12.5% in 1998/99 to 19.6% in 2007/08, and the incidence decreased from 2.7 to 2.4 per 100. Among people aged 60 years and older, the prevalence was higher among women than among men, as was the incidence among people aged 75 years and older. The prevalence and incidence were highest in the Atlantic region. For all age groups, all-cause mortality was higher among adults with diagnosed hypertension than among those without diagnosed hypertension. INTERPRETATION: The overall prevalence of diagnosed hypertension in Canada from 1998 to 2008 was high and increasing, whereas the incidence declined during the same period. These findings highlight the need to continue monitoring the effectiveness of efforts for managing hypertension and to enhance public health programs aimed at preventing hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data
Quan, H., Khan, N., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Tu, K., Chen, G., Campbell, N., Hill, M. D., Ghali, W. A., & McAlister, F. A. (2009) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.139279 · Cited by 350
Self-citation
Cited by
Dasgupta, K., Quinn, R. R., Zarnke, K. B., Rabi, D. M., Ravani, P., Daskalopoulou, S. S., Rabkin, S. W., Trudeau, L., Feldman, R. D., Cloutier, L., et al. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.002 · Cited by 270
Kaplan, R. M., & Stone, A. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143736 · Cited by 144
Kehoe, P. G. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-171119 · Cited by 133
(2017) · PubMed Central · Cited by 52
Dawes, M., Beerman, S., Gelfer, M., Hobson, B., Khan, N., Kuyper, L., Mangat, B., Tran, K., Wilson, M. G., & Kaczorowski, J. (2021) · Canadian Family Physician · doi:10.46747/cfp.6702112 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Robitaille, C., Dai, S., Waters, C., Loukine, L., Bancej, C., Quach, S., Ellison, J., Campbell, N., Tu, K., Reimer, K., Walker, R., Smith, M., Blais, C., & Quan, H.
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2011-11-21
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- E49-E56
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- OpenAlex
- W2080106186
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosed hypertension in Canada: incidence, prevalence and associated mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.101863
- The paper
- Robitaille, C., Dai, S., Waters, C., Loukine, L., Bancej, C., Quach, S., Ellison, J., Campbell, N., Tu, K., Reimer, K., Walker, R., Smith, M., Blais, C., & Quan, H. (2012). Diagnosed hypertension in Canada: incidence, prevalence and associated mortality. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.