The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Professionalism: Social media mishaps
Open accessAbstract
The “add photo” option on Facebook should probably be renamed the “you’ll soon regret posting this” button. Actually, social media in general has proven to be a virtual breeding ground of self-induced embarrassment — offensive jokes that seemed funny at the time, off-the-cuff comments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There is widespread international disquiet about the ramifications of online and social media on clinical practice [1-7].”
From How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey (2014) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey
Brown, J., Ryan, C., & Harris, A. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3589 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Collier, R.
- Corresponding author
- Collier, Roger
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2012-07-16
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- E627-E628
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- PMC
- PMC3447061
- OpenAlex
- W2104470887
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
- Keywords
- professionalism, social media, physician social media use, online comments, professional conduct
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
