Cited by 334Anesthesia and Pain ManagementPain Management and Opioid UseCancer survivorship and care

Predictors of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Open access
Wang, Li, Guyatt, Gordon H., Kennedy, Sean A., Romerosa, Beatriz, Kwon, Henry Y., Kaushal, Alka, Chang, Yaping, Craigie, Samantha +8 more·2016·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain after breast cancer surgery affects up to 60% of patients. Early identification of those at higher risk could help inform optimal management. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to explore factors associated with persistent pain among women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to Mar. 12, 2015, to identify cohort or case-control studies that explored the association between risk factors and persistent pain (lasting ≥ 2 mo) after breast cancer surgery. We pooled estimates of association using random-effects models, when possible, for all independent variables reported by more than 1 study. We reported relative measures of association as pooled odds ratios (ORs) and absolute measures of association as the absolute risk increase. RESULTS: Thirty studies, involving a total of 19 813 patients, reported the association of 77 independent variables with persistent pain. High-quality evidence showed increased odds of persistent pain with younger age (OR for every 10-yr decrement 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.48), radiotherapy (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.57), axillary lymph node dissection (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.73-3.35) and greater acute postoperative pain (OR for every 1 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.30). Moderate-quality evidence suggested an association with the presence of preoperative pain (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.64). Given the 30% risk of pain in the absence of risk factors, the absolute risk increase corresponding to these ORs ranged from 3% (acute postoperative pain) to 21% (axillary lymph node dissection). High-quality evidence showed no association with body mass index, type of breast surgery, chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. INTERPRETATION: Development of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery was associated with younger age, radiotherapy, axillary lymph node dissection, greater acute postoperative pain and preoperative pain. Axillary lymph node dissection provides the only high-yield target for a modifiable risk factor to prevent the development of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.151276

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 334

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [15]15. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for report- ing. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
  2. [17]17. Randolph AG, Cook D, Guyatt G. Prognosis. In: Guyatt G, Ren- nie D, Meade M, et al., editors. Users' guides to the medical lit- erature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015:421-9.
  3. [48]48. Warmuth MA, Bowen G, Prosnitz LR, et al. Complications of axillary lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the breast: a report based on a patient survey. Cancer 1998;83:1362-8.
  4. [67]67. Kostanyan M. Intercostobrachial syndrome after nerve-sparing axillary lymph node dissection. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:S127.

Authors
Wang, L., Guyatt, G. H., Kennedy, S. A., Romerosa, B., Kwon, H. Y., Kaushal, A., Chang, Y., Craigie, S., de Almeida, C. P. B., Couban, R. J., Parascandalo, S. R., Izhar, Z., Reid, S., Khan, J. S., McGillion, M., & Busse, J. W.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
188
Issue
14
Pages
E352-E361
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2464416702
Cited by
334
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
chronic pain, breast cancer surgery, postoperative pain, risk factors, axillary lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, acute postoperative pain, preoperative pain, age, breast cancer
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Axilla, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Mastectomy, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Risk Factors, Mastectomy, Segmental, Odds Ratio, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Preoperative Period, Chronic Pain, Mastodynia, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review