Cited by 256Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Structural MRI correlates for vulnerability and resilience to major depressive disorder

Open access
Amico, Francesco·2011·Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In major depressive disorder (MDD), it is unclear to what extent structural brain changes are associated with depressive episodes or represent part of the mechanism by which the risk for illness is mediated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether structural abnormalities are related to risk for the development of MDD. METHODS: We compared healthy controls with a positive family history for MDD (HC-FHP), healthy controls with no family history of any psychiatric disease (HC-FHN) and patients with MDD. Groups were age- and sex-matched. We analyzed data from high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging using voxel-based morphometry. We performed small volume corrections for our regions of interest (hippocampus, dorsolateral [DLPFC] and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex [DMPFC], anterior cingulate cortex [ACC] and basal ganglia) using a family-wise error correction (p < 0.05) to control for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There were 30 participants in the HC-FHP group, 64 in the HC-FHN group and 33 patients with MDD. The HC-FHP group had smaller right hippocampal and DLPFC grey matter volumes compared with the HC-FHN group, and even smaller right hippocampal volumes compared with patients with MDD. In addition, the HC-FHP group exhibited smaller white matter volumes in the DLPFC and left putamen but also greater volumes in 2 areas of the DMPFC compared with the HC-FHN group. Patients with MDD exhibited smaller volumes in the ACC, DMPFC, DLPFC and the basal ganglia compared with healthy controls. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective identification of family history might result in a bias toward unidentified participants in the control group at risk for MDD, diminishing the effect size. CONCLUSION: Volume reductions in the hippocampus and DLPFC might be associated with a greater risk for MDD. The HC-FHP group had smaller hippocampal volumes compared with patients with MDD, which is suggestive for neuroplastic effects of treatment. The HC-FHP group had not yet experienced a depressive episode and therefore might have been resilient and might have had some protective strategies. Whether resilience is associated with the larger white matter volumes in the DMPFC (e.g., owing to compensatory, neuroplastic remodelling mechanisms) needs to be confirmed in future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/jpn.090186

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies indicate that these structural changes may represent a pre-existing vulnerability to a major depressive episode, especially in people with particular genetic profiles or early life stress histories.

    “several other studies have found that these structural changes may reflect a pre-existing vulnerability to a MDE, particularly for individuals with certain genetic profiles and/or early life stress (ELS) histories (39–45).”
  • People without depression but with a family history of it tend to have smaller hippocampal and DLPFC volumes than those without such history.

    “healthy patients with a positive family history of depression being more likely to have decreased hippocampal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) volumes compared to a control group with no family history (Amico et al., 2011)”
  • In the same study, MDD patients had smaller volumes in the anterior cingulate, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and basal ganglia.

    “MDD subjects also exhibited decreased anterior cingulated cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), and basal ganglia volumes”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 256

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005;26: 839-51.
  2. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, et al. Automated Ta- lairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;10:120-31.
  3. Nestler EJ, Barrot M, DiLeone RJ, et al. Neurobiology of depres- sion. Neuron 2002;34:13-25.

Authors
Amico, F.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Amico, Francesco
Venue
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience
Published
2011-01-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
15-22
ISSN
1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098894213
Cited by
256
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, family history of depression, hippocampal volume, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, basal ganglia, white matter volume, gray matter volume, brain structural changes, depression vulnerability, resilience, neuroplasticity, voxel-based morphometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Atrophy, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Major Depressive Disorder, Family Health, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Prefrontal Cortex, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review