Dopamine and light: dissecting effects on mood and motivational states in women with subsyndromal seasonal affective disorder
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that bright light can improve mood, the neurobiology remains poorly understood. Some evidence implicates the catecholamines. In the present study, we measured the effects of transiently decreasing dopamine (DA) synthesis on mood and motivational states in healthy women with mild seasonal mood changes who were tested in either bright or dim light. METHODS: On 2 test days, participants slept overnight in a light-controlled room. On the morning of each session, half of the participants awoke to gradual increases of bright light, up to 3000 lux, and half to dim light (10 lux). For all participants, DA was reduced on 1 of the test days using the acute phenylalanine/tyrosine depletion (APTD) method; on the other day, they ingested a nutritionally balanced control mixture (BAL). Beginning 4 hours postingestion, participants completed subjective mood questionnaires, psychological tests and a progressive ratio breakpoint task during which they worked for successive units of $5. RESULTS: Thirty-two women participated in our study. The APTD lowered mood, agreeableness, energy and the willingness to work for monetary reward. The effects on energy and motivation were independent of light, while the effects on mood and agreeableness were seen in the dim condition only, being prevented by bright light. LIMITATIONS: Acute phenylalanine/tyrosine depletion might affect systems other than DA. The sample size was small. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that increased DA function may be responsible for some of the beneficial effects of light, while adding to the evidence that the neurobiology of mood and motivational states can be dissociated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Cawley, E., Park, S., aan het Rot, M., Sancton, K., Benkelfat, C., Young, S., Boivin, D., & Leyton, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 388-397
- ISSN
- 1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3819153
- OpenAlex
- W2122336413
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine, bright light, seasonal affective disorder, mood, motivation, catecholamines, agreeableness, energy, women, seasonal mood changes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Light, Motivation, Phenylalanine, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Tyrosine, Seasonal Affective Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review