The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the intersections between renewable energy, sustainable development and the challenges of environmental justice in Nigeria
Abstract
One of the greatest challenges besetting Nigeria is the excessive dependence on fossil fuels for energy and economic sustenance. The non-renewable nature of fossil fuels and the degradation it wreaks on the environment has raised doubts about the attainment of sustainable development in Nigeria unless there is a move towards renewable energy. This is imperative due to the advent of hydraulic fracturing in the USA, the instability in the global oil market, the inevitable depletion of fossil fuels and the recent COP-21 agreement. This paper thus examines the prospects of sustainable development in Nigeria in view of the government's over-dependence on fossil fuels as well as the implications of such over-dependence on environmental sustainability and the attainment of environmental justice in Nigeria. The paper further argues for a shift towards the stable utilisation of renewable energy to avoid further damage to the environment caused by reliance on conventional energy sources.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Where financial instability is chronic, social impact may become fragmented, interrupted, or diminished because programs cannot be maintained at the level required for effectiveness (Adeojo and Osinibi, 2016).”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Adeojo and Osinibi, 2016
In the citing paper
“Yet many nonprofits operate with limited forecasting capacity, relying on short-term budgeting, informal assumptions, or reactive decision-making rather than systematic financial planning (Adeojo and Osinibi, 2016).”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Adeojo and Osinibi, 2016
In the citing paper
“Weak financial planning and forecasting systems are another major challenge affecting sustainability and resource allocation in nonprofit organizations.”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Adeojo and Osinibi, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aliliele, C., Eboh, E. E., & Odihi, F. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit251117154
Metadata
- Authors
- Adeojo, O. O., & Osinibi, O. M.
- Affiliations
- Olabisi Onabanjo University (NG)
- Venue
- Interdisciplinary Environmental Review
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149
- ISSN
- 1521-0227 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2343646559
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interdisciplinary Environmental Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- renewable energy, sustainable development, environmental justice, fossil fuel dependence, Nigeria, energy transition, hydraulic fracturing, COP21, environmental degradation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
