The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision support systems for air traffic controllers based on the analysis of their decision-making processes
Abstract
The growth of air traffic generates a multitude of data and parameters that makes it increasing difficult for air traffic controllers to choose rapidly and safely what to decide. The study of air-traffic control of full or partial automation over the past years highlights the need for better tools to meet the challenges of modern air-traffic management. Initial attempts of full automation have mistakenly side lined air-traffic controllers in their role as key players in air-traffic management. This has led to human-machine cooperation studies that actively involve air-traffic controllers in the resolution of problems. Such studies show the advantages of creating cooperative tools in concert with the conflict management process. The designing of conflict resolution tools in this way implies, however, detailed knowledge of air traffic controllers’ decision-making processes. To do this, we have developed a cooperative multi-criteria approach based on data taken from case study interviews. This shows how it is possible to extract criteria and preferences in designing bottom-up decision aiding tools. In doing this, we have laid down the foundation for the creation of decision support system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introducing qualitative research in psychology : adventures in theory and method
Willig, C. (2008) · Cited by 2,292
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
French, S. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600981 · Cited by 1,280
ENDSLEY, M. R., & KABER, D. B. (1999) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401399185595 · Cited by 1,088
Introducing Qualitative Research
Rosaline, B. (2008) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857029034 · Cited by 1,066
Action research for language teachers
Wallace, M. J. (1997) · Cited by 745
Automation and situation awareness.
Endsley, M. R. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781315137957-8 · Cited by 282
Common work space for human–machine cooperation in air traffic control
Pacaux‐Lemoine, M., & Debernard, S. (2002) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/s0967-0661(01)00060-0 · Cited by 77
Self-citationAn architecture for tailoring cooperative multi-user displays
Bentley, R., Rodden, T. A., Sawyer, P., et al. (1992) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/143457.143478 · Cited by 59
Hoc, J., & Debernard, S. (2002) · Connection Science · doi:10.1080/0954009021000068745 · Cited by 40
Self-citationVanderhaegen, F., Crévits, I., Debernard, S., & Millot, P. (1994) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447319409526084 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Annebicque, D., Crévits, I., Poulain, T., Debernard, S., & Millot, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Operations Management
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 85
- ISSN
- 1758-938X
- 1758-9398
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 20
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision support systems for air traffic controllers based on the analysis of their decision-making processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1504/ijaom.2012.045892
- The paper
- Annebicque, D., Crévits, I., Poulain, T., Debernard, S., & Millot, P. (2012). Decision support systems for air traffic controllers based on the analysis of their decision-making processes. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaom.2012.045892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.