Integrated farming in Greece: a transition-to-sustainability perspective
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the linking process between a niche and the regime in the context of an emergent transition, using the concepts of 'anchoring' and 'translation' embedded in the broader multi-level perspective. The case study concerns the transition of an intensive farming system, from subsidy oriented productivism, towards an integrated farming (IF) system focusing on the market, in the canned peach sector in Imathia, Northern Greece. The study revealed an anchored regime-triggered innovation, which resulted in the creation of a market niche within the incumbent regime. In this transition, all forms of anchoring are involved, and various forms of translation were encountered while a hybrid forum was identified, serving as the 'fertile ground' upon which all subsequent networking and translation activities took place. Research findings question a clear-cut analytical separation between the three levels of the multi-level perspective, as well as the relevance of a bottom-up procedure as a prerequisite for niche emergence vis-à-vis policy induced change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The two districts are characterized as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones according to Directive 91/676/EEC.
“the two districts are interesting examples of environmental degradation as they are characterized as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones according to the Directive 91 / 676 / EEC [27].”
From Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Divergent Mediterranean Farming Systems: Cyprus as a Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 18
- Authors
- Vlahos, G., Karanikolas, P., & Koutsouris, A.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
- Venue
- International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43
- ISSN
- 1462-4605 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-5004
- OpenAlex
- W2610363249
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- integrated farming systems, sustainability transitions, multi-level perspective, anchoring, translation, intensive agriculture, agricultural subsidies, niche markets, hybrid forums, bottom-up change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review