Cited by 149Additive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesPowder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Powder-based additive manufacturing-a review of types of defects, generation mechanisms, detection, property evaluation and metrology

Taheri, Hossein, Shoaib, Mohammad Rashid Bin Mohammad, Koester, Lucas W., Bigelow, Timothy A., Collins, Peter C., Bond, Leonard J.·2017·International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing

Abstract

Powder-based additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have been evaluated for use in different fields of application (aerospace, medical, etc.). Ideally, AM parts should be at least equivalent, or preferably better quality than conventionally produced parts. Manufacturing defects and their effects on the quality and performance of AM parts are a currently a major concern. It is essential to understand the defect types, their generation mechanisms, and the detection methodologies for mechanical properties evaluation and quality control. We consider the various types of microstructural features or defects, their generation mechanisms, their effect on bulk properties and the capability of existing characterisation methodologies for powder based AM parts in this work. Methods of in-situ non-destructive evaluation and the influence of defects on mechanical properties and design considerations are also reviewed. Together, these provide a framework to understand the relevant machine and material parameters, optimise the process and production, and select appropriate characterisation methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijasmm.2017.088204

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taheri, H., Shoaib, M. R. B. M., Koester, L. W., Bigelow, T. A., Collins, P. C., & Bond, L. J.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing
Published
2017
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
172
ISSN
  • 2057-4975 (ISSN-L)
  • 2057-4983
OpenAlex
W2768427822
Cited by
149
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
Keywords
powder-based additive manufacturing, manufacturing defects, defect formation mechanism, defect detection, non-destructive testing, mechanical properties, microstructure, quality control, metrology, in situ characterization, process parameters, design considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review