The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of the effects of aging on biometric identity verification
Abstract
The performance of biometric authentication systems is affected by discrepancies between data stored in biometric templates and corresponding data derived from the actual owners of biometric templates. Such discrepancies are mainly attributed to within-person variations of biometric features. Among all types of within-person variations, aging-related variation displays unique characteristics that make the process of dealing with aging a challenging task. In this paper we discuss how aging affects different types of biometric features and discuss possible approaches that aim to eliminate the effects of aging so that deterioration in the long-term performance of biometric authentication systems is minimised. © 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aging in biometric features results in performance degradation for biometric recognition systems.
“Aging in biometric features results in performance degradation for biometric recognition systems [9].”
From Longitudinal Evaluation of Child Face Recognition and the Impact of Underlying Age (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
(2008) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71041-9 · Cited by 1,406
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Longitudinal Evaluation of Child Face Recognition and the Impact of Underlying Age
Singh, S., Bahmani, K., & Schuckers, S. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/ijcb62174.2024.10744505 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Lanitis, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Biometrics
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34
- ISSN
- 1755-8301
- 1755-831X
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
