Heywood cases: possible causes and solutions
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the causes and recommend possible solutions to the Heywood cases. The study reviews the literature from 1960-2021 using the keyword search, 'Heywood cases,' 'Improper solutions,' and 'Negative variance'. The studies were explored from selected databases viz. Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. The study has found that fixing the negative variance to zero is the most widely used solution to the Heywood cases. The study also found that multivariate normality, small sample size with a large number of indicators, factor loadings of less than 0.5, and model misspecification are the possible causes of Heywood cases. The study suggests novel solutions to overcome the possibility of the Heywood cases, including fixing the negative variance to zero, maintaining the large sample size, and increasing the number of indicators in the construct. The study can be beneficial to the researchers who validate the model using CB-SEM. The study offers a basic understanding of the possible causes and novel solutions to the Heywood cases to help the researchers better develop the constructs/scales. The present research guides the researchers through the various effects of Heywood cases on the study's findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These residual variances were fixed to zero for stable model estimation.
“These residual variances were fixed to zero for stable model estimation (a common method to overcome Heywood cases; Farooq, 2022).”
From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Farooq, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET)
Chu, C., Hoff, K. A., Liu, Z., Heimpel, N. F., Greco, A., Oswald, F. L., & Rounds, J. (2026) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727251322520 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Farooq, R.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Farooq, Rayees
- ORCID
- Farooq, Rayees
- Venue
- International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79
- ISSN
- 1755-8050 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-8069
- OpenAlex
- W4225762918
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- Heywood cases, confirmatory factor analysis, model misspecification, multivariate normality, small sample size, factor loadings, construct validation, scale development, improper solutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review