Cited by 5Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Building Design and AssessmentSustainable Supply Chain Management

Deconstruction of structures: an overview of economic issues

Munroe, Tapan, Hatamiya, Lon, Westwind, Mark·2006·International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management

Abstract

As federal, state and municipal governments strive to reduce the volume of solid waste that is buried or incinerated, salvaging reusable and recyclable building materials through 'deconstruction' is rapidly becoming an attractive alternative. Until recently, most contractors and developers have relied primarily on business profitability considerations when making the 'demolition vs. deconstruction' decision which, not surprisingly, have favoured demolition because demolition is often faster, less labour intensive, and usually more convenient. Slowly but surely, the balance is shifting – an increasing number of deconstruction projects have shown that deconstructing buildings can be economically and technically viable. The lessons of these projects as well as public policies aimed at providing the appropriate incentives (as well as disincentives) can help in the maturation of a market-based deconstruction industry as part of the larger construction industry cluster.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijetm.2006.009002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deconstruction can increase the reusability of the recovered building components.

    “Although deconstruction can increase the reusability of the recovered building components (Addis, 2006; Munroe et al., 2006), it is believed to be more labour intensive (Chileshe et al., 2015; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Munroe et al., 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munroe, T., Hatamiya, L., & Westwind, M.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management
Published
2006
Volume
6
Issue
3/4
Pages
375
ISSN
  • 1466-2132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-511X
OpenAlex
W2031316204
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
building deconstruction, demolition, construction and demolition waste, recyclable building materials, economic feasibility, market incentives, public policy, waste reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review