The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy
Abstract
Starting from the co-evolutionary development of innovation practice, theory and policy, five functions are identified that play a crucial role in the management of present-day innovation processes: (1) management of interfaces, (2) (de-)construction and organising (innovation) systems, (3) providing a platform for learning and experimenting, (4) providing an infrastructure for strategic intelligence and (5) stimulating demand articulation, strategy and vision development. From a first analysis of innovation policy instrument portfolios, it is concluded that the already existing instruments only cover a small part of the five ''systemic'' functions. Furthermore it is concluded that the portfolios are heavily dominated by financial instruments. It is argued that the development of a (relatively) new type of instrument, the systemic instruments, should be furthered in order to tune the instrument portfolio better to the needs of actors involved in innovation processes. In order to obtain a better insight into the characteristics of systemic instruments, their success and fail factors, and into strategies for their further development, effectiveness and use, an analysis of four systemic instruments avant la letter is presented. From this analysis, conclusions concerning the need for and best practice of systemic instruments are drawn, suggestions for policy are derived and questions for further research are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Clark, T., & Porter, M. W. (1991) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251962 · Cited by 17,449
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
(2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,032
von Hippel, E. (2007) · Das Summa Summarum des Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_10 · Cited by 5,098
Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization.
Brown, M. C., & Simon, H. A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065048 · Cited by 4,801
The New Production of Knowledge
Gibbons, M. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,405
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987) · Cited by 2,957
Sectoral systems of innovation and production
Malerba, F. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 · Cited by 2,733
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics
Kohli, U., & Rosenberg, N. (1984) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1058352 · Cited by 1,922
Cited by
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · Cited by 2,741
Self-citationPolicy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 · Cited by 1,524
The choice of innovation policy instruments
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002 · Cited by 890
Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · Cited by 852
Innovation policy: what, why, and how
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx001 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 1740-2816 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-2824
- OpenAlex
- W2125126766
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 43.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1504/ijfip.2004.004621
- The paper
- Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfip.2004.004621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.