The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A survey of architectural techniques for DRAM power management
Abstract
Recent trends of CMOS technology scaling and wide-spread use of multicore processors have dramatically increased the power consumption of main memory. It has been estimated that modern data-centres spend more than 30% of their total power consumption in main memory alone. This excessive power dissipation has created the problem of ‘memory power wall’ which has emerged as a major design constraint inhibiting further performance scaling. Recently, several techniques have been proposed to address this issue. The focus of this paper is to survey several architectural techniques designed for improving power efficiency of main memory systems, specifically DRAM systems. To help the reader in gaining insights into the similarities and differences between the techniques, this paper also presents a classification of the techniques on the basis of their characteristics. The aim of this paper is to equip the engineers and architects with knowledge of the state of the art DRAM power saving techniques and motivate them to design novel solutions for addressing the challenges presented by the memory power wall problem.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CPU-only or GPU-only systems are usually over-provisioned to meet worst-case performance requirements, but their average utilization remains low.
“To meet the worse-case performance requirements, the CPU-only or GPU-only systems are usually over-provisioned, however, their average utilization remains low [Mittal 2012;Mittal and Vetter 2015].”
From A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques (2015) · cites this paper as Mittal 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques
Mittal, S., & Vetter, J. S. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2788396 · Cited by 568
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mittal, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of High Performance Systems Architecture
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110
- ISSN
- 1751-6528
- 1751-6536
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review