The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The innovative model for extracting tacit knowledge in organisations
Abstract
This research aimed to examine the obstacles of classical practices for extracting tacit knowledge, and to propose a new method of self-extracting tacit knowledge in organisations. This study opted for an exploratory study using the mixed methods research covering both qualitative and quantitative studies. The focus group interview was used to obtain qualitative information from 24 executives and experts in knowledge management, in five organisations. ATLAS.ti was used to analyse focus group data. The quantitative data was gained from a survey of 26 executives and KM experts who participated in the KM seminar. The result from the analysis was then used to develop a model of tacit knowledge extraction. The key finding is that major challenges of extracting tacit knowledge are lack of certainty of corporate policy, lack of motivation, lack of continuity in knowledge management activities, lack of a support system for the learning environment, lack of participation, non-supportive culture and behaviour, lack of preparation for interviewing, discontinuity in interviews during extraction of tacit knowledge, misinterpreted questioning, and inexperienced interviewers has a lack of experience. Web-based applications were the key source for the questions, which were comprised of both primary and secondary questions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Anos, C. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7607 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Supanitchaisiri, M., Natakuatoong, O., & Sinthupinyo, S.
- Affiliations
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- ORCID
- Sinthupinyo, Sukree
- Venue
- International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81
- ISSN
- 1743-8268 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8276
- OpenAlex
- W4234126400
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
- Keywords
- knowledge management, interviewers, organizational culture, learning environment, knowledge management policy, web-based questionnaire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The innovative model for extracting tacit knowledge in organisations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1504/ijkms.2020.105074
- The paper
- Supanitchaisiri, M., Natakuatoong, O., & Sinthupinyo, S. (2020). The innovative model for extracting tacit knowledge in organisations. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkms.2020.105074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.