The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Smart(phone) travelling: understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys
Abstract
This article analyses how mobile technology impacts on irregular migrants' journeys. It is based on trajectory ethnography with 11 Afghan, Iranian and Syrian migrants whom the first author met in Turkey and Greece in the spring of 2015. These migrants were followed (partly digitally) to Serbia, Hungary, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands. We argue that the method of trajectory ethnography is a useful tool that allows us to understand how mobile technology shapes and facilitate parts of the journey - like, for example, decisions on routes and modes of travel, final destinations and the financing of irregular migration. This methodology leads to a more nuanced understanding of irregular migration because it enables us to capture the complex dynamics involved in irregular migration processes and to reflect on decisions taken within the process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Smartphones are of crucial importance to Syrian refugees [24] who often demonstrate high levels of technological literacy [25].”
From Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart Refugees: How Syrian Asylum Migrants Use Social Media Information in Migration Decision-Making
Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J., & Vonk, H. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118764439 · Cited by 447
User-Centered App Adaptation of a Low-Intensity E-Mental Health Intervention for Syrian Refugees
Burchert, S., Alkneme, M. S., Bird, M., Carswell, K., Cuijpers, P., Hansen, P., Heim, E., Harper Shehadeh, M., Sijbrandij, M., van't Hof, E., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00663 · Cited by 160
Navigating a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna
Kaufmann, K. (2018) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1437205 · Cited by 163
Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization
Leurs, K., & Ponzanesi, S. (2018) · Popular Communication · doi:10.1080/15405702.2017.1418359 · Cited by 152
Alencar, A. P., Kondova, K., & Ribbens, W. (2018) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443718813486 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Zijlstra, J., & Liempt, I. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Venue
- International Journal of Migration and Border Studies
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2/3
- Pages
- 174
- ISSN
- 1755-2419 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-2427
- OpenAlex
- W4244196866
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 35.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Migration and Border Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- irregular migration, mobile technology, migrant journeys, digital ethnography, route choice, migration financing, Afghan migrants, Iranian immigrants, Syrian migrants, 2015 refugee crisis, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, Netherlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review