Cited by 24Digital Transformation in IndustryImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyQuality and Supply Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyber-physical systems with autonomous machine-to-machine communication: Industry 4.0 and its particular potential for purchasing and supply management

Open access
Schiele, Holger, Torn, Robbert Jan·2020·International Journal of Procurement Management

Abstract

The number of publications on the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0, short: I4.0) has increased exponentially. Likewise, significant investments by firms are planned. However, the link between purchasing and I4.0 is largely lacking even though procurement managers have high expectations. The fourth industrial revolution - which refers to the use of cyber-physical systems (CPSs) with autonomous machine-to-machine communication - could have several implications for purchasing processes. Support systems for purchasers are been developed, such as contract analysis software, and the possibility of digital negotiations has emerged and could revitalise e-marketplaces. Operative processes can act autonomously, with automated demand identification in CPSs. To support the development of I4.0 strategies in purchasing, this paper contributes by clearly defining I4.0, distinguishing it from the third industrial revolution, structuring the potential development paths of I4.0 in purchasing and by presenting the result of a project to develop a I4.0 maturity model for purchasing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijpm.2020.108617

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Andreasen, P.H. and Gammelgaard, B. (2018) 'Change within purchasing and supply management organisations -assessing the claims from maturity models', Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp.151-163.
  2. Angeles, R. and Nath, R. (2007) 'Business-to-business e-procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation', Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.104-115.
  3. Baarslag, T., Kaisers, M., Gerding, E., Jonker, C.M. and Gratch, J. (2017) 'When will negotiation agents be able to represent us? 'The challenges and opportunities for autonomous negotiators', Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.4684-4690.
  4. Bititci, U.S., Garengo, P., Ates, A. and Nudurupati, S.S. (2015) 'Value of maturity models in performance measurement', International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53, No. 10, pp.3062-3085.
  5. Bohanec, M., Kljajić Borštnar, M. and Robnik-Šikonja, M. (2017) 'Explaining machine learning models in sales predictions', Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 71, pp.416-428.
  6. Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M. and Rosenberg, M. (2014) 'How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective', International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial Science and Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.37-44.
  7. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) 'The productivity paradox of information technology', Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp.66-77.
  8. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (2000) 'Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance', The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.23-48.
  9. Cao, M., Luo, X., Luo, X. and Dai, X. (2015) 'Automated negotiation for e-commerce decision making: a goal deliberated agent architecture for multi-strategy selection', Decision Support Systems, Vol. 73, pp.1-14.
  10. Cette, G. and de Pommerol, O.J. (2018) 'Dromadaire ou chameau? À propos de la troisième révolution industrielle', Futuribles, Vol. 422, pp.5-17.
  11. De Boer, L., Harink, J. and Heijboer, G. (2002) 'A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement', European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.25-33.
  12. Devine, W.D. (1983) 'From shafts to wires: historical perspective on electrification', The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp.347-372.
  13. Dutta, D. and Bose, I. (2015) 'Managing a big data project: the case of Ramco cements limited', International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 165, pp.293-306.
  14. El Sawy, O.A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y.K. and Pavlou, P.A. (2010) 'Research commentary-seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango', Information Systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.835-848.
  15. Ellram, L.M., Tate, W.L. and Feitzinger, E.G. (2013) 'Factor-market rivalry and competition for supply chain resources', Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.29-46.
  16. Evangelista, R. and Vezzani, A. (2010) 'The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis', Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 10, pp.1253-1263.
  17. Foerstl, K., Schleper, M.C. and Henke, M. (2017) 'Purchasing and supply management: from efficiency to effectiveness in an integrated supply chain', Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp.223-228.
  18. Fukui, T. (2016) 'A systems approach to big data technology applied to supply chain', 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, IEEE, pp.3732-3736.
  19. Geisberger, E. and Broy, M. (2012) agendaCPS: Integrierte Forschungsagenda Cyber-Physical Systems, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
  20. Ghadimi, P., Wang, C., Lim, M.K. and Heavey, C. (2019) 'Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: theory and application for Industry 4.0 supply chains', Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 127, pp.588-600.
  21. Greenwood, J. (1999) 'The third industrial revolution: technology, productivity, and income equality', Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.2-12.
  22. Hazelaar, R. (2016) From Standardisation, through Integration and Automation, into Machine-to-Machine Communication: A Field Problem Solving Project, Master's thesis, University of Twente.
  23. Hofmann, M., Neukart, F. and Bäck, T. (2017) Artificial Intelligence and Data Science in the Automotive Industry, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1709.01989. · arXiv
  24. Hwang, J.S. (2016) 'The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): intelligent manufacturing', SMT Surface Mount Technology Magazine, Vol. 31, pp.10-15.
  25. Idrus, A., Mahmoud, M.A., Ahmad, M.S., Yahya, A. and Husen, H. (2017) 'A solution generator algorithm for decision making based automated negotiation in the construction domain', International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Multimedia, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp.18-23.
  26. Jensen, M.C. (1993) 'The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems', The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp.831-880.
  27. Jodlbauer, H. and Schagerl, M. (2016) 'Reifegradmodell Industrie 4.0 -Ein Vorgehensmodell zur Identifikation von Industrie 4.0 Potentialen', GI-Jahrestagung, pp.1473-1487.
  28. Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Arnold, C. and Voigt, K-I. (2017) 'Sustainable industrial value creation: benefits and challenges of Industry 4.0', International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 21, p.1740015.
  29. Kleemann, F.C. and Glas, A.H. (2017) Einkauf 4.0: Digitale Transformation der Beschaffung, Springer, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  30. Koch, V., Kuge, S., Geissbauer, R. and Schrauf, S. (2014) 'Industry 4.0: opportunities and challenges of the industrial internet', Strategy & PwC, pp.5-50.
  31. Kosmol, T., Kaufmann, L. and Reimann, F. (2018) 'Leapfrogging and co-evolution -towards a maturity model for the digital transformation', 22nd IPSERA Conference, Athens.
  32. Lanza, G., Nyhuis, P., Ansari, S.M., Kuprat, T. and Liebrecht, C. (2016) 'Befähigungs-und Einführungsstrategien für Industrie 4.0', ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Vol. 111, Nos. 1-2, pp.76-79.
  33. Lee, J., Bagheri, B. and Kao, H-A. (2015) 'A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems', Manufacturing Letters, Vol. 3, pp.18-23.
  34. Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B. and Kao, H-A. (2013) 'Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment', Manufacturing Letters, Vol. 1, pp.38-41.
  35. Leyh, C., Bley, K., Schäffer, T. and Forstenhäusler, S. (2016) 'SIMMI 4.0 -a maturity model for classifying the enterprise-wide it and software landscape focusing on Industry 4.0', 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), IEEE, pp.1297-1302.
  36. Liu, Y. and Grusky, D.B. (2013) 'The payoff to skill in the third industrial revolution', American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 118, No. 5, pp.1330-1374.
  37. Mokyr, J. (2005) 'The intellectual origins of modern economic growth', The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp.285-351.
  38. Monostori, L. (2014) 'Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges', Procedia CIRP, pp.9-13.
  39. Oks, S.J., Fritzsche, A. and Möslein, K.M. (2017) 'An application map for industrial cyber-physical systems', in Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Song, H. and Rawat, D. (Eds.): Industrial Internet of Things, pp.21-46, Springer Series in Wireless Technology, Springer, Cham.
  40. Perez, C. (2010) 'Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms', Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp.185-202.
  41. Presutti Jr., W.D. (2003) 'Supply management and e-procurement: creating value added in the supply chain', Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp.219-226.
  42. Pulles, N.J., Schiele, H., Veldman, J. and Hüttinger, L. (2016) 'The impact of customer attractiveness and supplier satisfaction on becoming a preferred customer', Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 54, pp.129-140.
  43. Ramsay, J. (2001) 'The resource based perspective, rents, and purchasing's contribution to sustainable competitive advantage', Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp.38-47.
  44. Rockwell Automation (2014) 'The connected enterprise maturity model', Rockwell Automation, Vol. 12, pp.1-12.
  45. Schiele, H. (2007) 'Supply-management maturity, cost savings and purchasing absorptive capacity: testing the procurement-performance link', Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp.274-293.
  46. Schiele, H. (2012) 'Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer', Research-Technology Management, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp.44-50.
  47. Schiele, H. (2019) 'Purchasing and supply management', in Klumpp, M., Zijm, H., Heragu, S. and Regattieri, A. (Eds.): Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Springer, Cham.
  48. Schuh, G., Potente, T., Varandani, R., Hausberg, C. and Fränken, B. (2014) 'Collaboration moves productivity to the next level', Procedia CIRP, Vol. 17, pp.3-8.
  49. Schulze-Horn, I., Pulles, N., Schiele, H. and Scheffler, P. (2018) 'Using mechanism design theory in negotiations to improve purchasing performance', International Journal of Procurement Management, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp.777-800.
  50. Stork, A. (2015) 'Visual computing challenges of advanced manufacturing and Industrie 4.0 guest editors' introduction]', IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.21-25.
  51. Sung, T.K. (2018) 'Industry 4.0: a Korea perspective', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 132, pp.40-45.
  52. Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H. and Sui, F. (2018) 'Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data', The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 94, Nos. 9-11, pp.3563-3576.
  53. Tapscott, D. and Tapscott, A. (2017) 'How blockchain will change organizations', MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, p.10. Thoben, K-D., Wiesner, S. and Wuest, T. (2017) ''Industrie 4.0' and smart manufacturing - a review of research issues and application examples', International Journal of Automation Technology, Vol. 11, No.
  54. Tien, J.M. (2012) 'The next industrial revolution: integrated services and goods', Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp.257-296.
  55. Tjahjono, B., Esplugues, C., Ares, E. and Pelaez, G. (2017) 'What does Industry 4.0 mean to supply chain?', Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 13, pp.1175-1182.
  56. Voth, H-J. (2003) 'Living standards during the Industrial Revolution: an economist's guide', American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp.221-226.
  57. Wee, D., Kelly, R., Cattel, J. and Breunig, M. (2015) Industry 4.0 -How to Navigate Digitization of the Manufacturing Sector, Vol. 58, McKinsey & Company.
  58. Wu, S. and Kersten, G.E. (2017) 'Procurement auctions and negotiations: an empirical comparison', Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.281-303.
  59. Xu, X. (2017) 'Machine Tool 4.0 for the new era of manufacturing', The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 92, Nos. 5-8, pp.1893-1900.
  60. Zhang, L. and Liu, Q. (2016) 'An automated multi-issue negotiation mechanism based on intelligent agents in e-commerce', Journal of Advanced Management Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.172-175.
  61. Zhongzhi, L., Daniel, P. and Adegoke, O. (2016) 'Supply chain technologies: linking adoption, utilization, and performance', Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp.22-41.
  62. Zunk, B.M., Marchner, M.J., Uitz, I., Lerch, C. and Schiele, H. (2014) 'The role of e-procurement in the Austrian construction industry: adoption rate, benefits and barriers', International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.13-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schiele, H., & Torn, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Procurement Management
Published
2020
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
507
ISSN
  • 1753-8432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-8440
OpenAlex
W2948402584
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Procurement Management (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
Industry 4.0, cyber-physical systems, machine-to-machine communication, purchasing, supply management, procurement management, online marketplaces, third industrial revolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review