The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Innovation, what innovation? A comparison between product, process and organisational innovation
Abstract
This article compares and contrasts three types of innovations, namely, product innovation, process innovation and organisational innovation. From similarities and differences between these three types, implications for the theory and practice of innovation management are inferred. Most of these implications seem to be generic, i.e. generally applicable whatever the type of innovation and organisation involved. Surprisingly few implications are contingent in that they are linked to the characteristics of the innovation involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Khan, M. T., Idrees, M. D., Rauf, M., Sami, A., Ansari, A., & Jamil, A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14063362 · Cited by 118
“According to Boer and During [63], technological innovation aims to increase flexibility, decrease delivery time, and lower operational expenses.”
Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Arribas, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.005 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Boer, H., & During, W. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Management
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1/2/3
- Pages
- 83
- ISSN
- 0267-5730 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-5276
- OpenAlex
- W2167371741
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
