New diagnostic criteria of adrenal subclinical cushing's syndrome: Opinion from the Japan endocrine society
Open accessAbstract
New diagnostic criteria and the treatment policy for adrenal subclinical Cushing's syndrome (SCS) are proposed on behalf of the Japan Endocrine Society. The Japanese version has been published, and the essential contents are presented in this English-language version. The current diagnostic criteria for SCS have elicited two main problems: (i) the relatively low reliability of a low range of serum cortisol essential for the diagnosis by an overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST); (ii) different cutoff values for serum cortisol after a 1-mg DST compared with those of other countries. Thus, new criteria are needed. In the new criteria, three hierarchical cortisol cutoff values, 5.0, 3.0 and 1.8 μg/dL, after a 1-mg DST are presented. Serum cortisol ≥5 μg/dL after a 1-mg DST alone is considered sufficient to judge autonomous cortisol secretion for the diagnosis of SCS, and the current criterion based on serum cortisol ≥3 μg/dL after a 1-mg DST can continue to be used. Clinical evidence suggests that serum cortisol ≥1.8-2.9 μg/dL after a 1-mg DST is not always normal, so cases who meet the cutoff value as well as a basal adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level <10 pg/mL (or poor ACTH response to corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)) and nocturnal serum cortisol ≥5 μg/dL are proposed to have SCS. We suggest surgery if cases show serum cortisol ≥5 μg/dL after a 1-mg DST (or are disheartened by treatment-resistant problems) or suspicious cases of adrenal cancer according to tumor imaging.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For patients with adrenal incidentaloma, DST is the most commonly recommended first-line screening test for ACS.
“For patients with adrenal incidentaloma, DST is the most commonly recommended first-line screening test for ACS (1–5).”
From The diagnostic value of salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone in patients with suspected hypercortisolism (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
There is no international consensus on how ACS in patients with adrenal incidentalomas should be diagnosed, and different recommendations have been provided.
“Currently, there is no international consensus on how ACS in patients with adrenal incidentalomas should be diagnosed, and different recommendations have been provided (1–5, 21–23).”
From The diagnostic value of salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone in patients with suspected hypercortisolism (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 90
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Yanase T, Fujieda K, Kajieda H, Tanahashi Y, Suzuki S (2011) A nationwide epidemiological study of Addison's disease and subclinical Cushing's disease. Annual report of Intractable Disease Research Grant of Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan"Research on Adrenal Hormone Disorders" 2010: 117-124 (In Japanese).
- Consensus of Practice in Adrenal tumor (The third edition, March 2015) edited by The Japanese Urological Associa- tion, The Japanese Society of Pathology, The Japan Radio- logical Society, The Japan Endocrine Society and Japan Association of Endocrine Surgens (Kanehara) 1-123, 2015 (In Japanese)
- Authors
- Yanase, T., Oki, Y., Katabami, T., Otsuki, M., Kageyama, K., Tanaka, T., Kawate, H., Tanabe, M., Doi, M., Akehi, Y., & Ichijo, T.
- Affiliations
- Fukuoka University (JP)
- Hamamatsu University (JP)
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Hirosaki University (JP)
- Chiba University (JP)
- Kyushu University (JP)
- Doi Clinic, Kumamoto 861-5255, Japan
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama 230-0012, Japan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Endocrine Journal
- Publisher
- Japan Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-393
- ISSN
- 0918-8959 (ISSN-L)
- 1348-4540
- OpenAlex
- W2790100202
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Endocrine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- Hirosaki University
- Chiba University
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K09815)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- diagnostic criteria, autonomous cortisol secretion, ACTH, corticotropin-releasing hormone test, adrenalectomy, adrenal cancer
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Function Tests, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Cushing Syndrome, Dexamethasone, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Japan, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review