Screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus in Japan in 2018: a retrospective cohort study using a national surveillance questionnaire
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening methods and GDM incidences. In 2018, a national questionnaire was administered at 231 institutions (56.6%) of all 408 perinatal medical centers in Japan. Of 100,485 women, 2,982 (3.0%) were diagnosed with GDM during their first pregnancy period (FPP) and 7,289 (7.3%) were diagnosed with GDM during their middle pregnancy period (MPP). The proportion of women diagnosed with GDM during FPP and MPP using 95 mg/dL as the cutoff value (CV) for random plasma glucose (PG) at FPP (4.3% and 9.2%) was significantly higher than that of women diagnosed with GDM using 100 mg/dL as the CV for random PG (2.7% and 6.9%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Compared with women screened for GDM using "random PG and random PG," women who were screened for GDM using "random PG and 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT)" had a significantly higher incidence of GDM (6.6% versus 8.9%, p < 0.0001). Using random PG and 50-g GCT, the incidence of GDM among women diagnosed at MPP using a CV of 95 mg/dL at FPP was significantly higher than that of women diagnosed using a CV of 100 mg/dL (16.5% versus 7.8%: p < 0.0001). While, using "random PG and random PG," the incidences of GDM among women were similar between institutions using a CV of 100 mg/dL and those using a CV of 95 mg/dL at FPP (6.7% versus 6.9%: p = 0.3581). This study showed random PG as a first-step screening method in MPP may overlook women with GDM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Japan, women screened for GDM using random plasma glucose and a 50 g GCT had a significantly higher incidence of GDM (6.6% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.0001).
“Moreover, women who were screened for GDM using random plasma glucose and a 50 g GCT had a significantly higher incidence of GDM (6.6% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.0001) [226].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [226]
In Japan, in 2018, the percentage of women screened using 5.3 mmol/L as cut-off for random plasma glucose was significantly higher than those tested using 5.55 mmol/L (2.7% and 6.9%, p < 0.0001).
“The percentage of women screened using 5.3 mmol/L (95 mg/dL) as the cut-off value for random plasma glucose was significantly higher in comparison to those who were tested using 5.55 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) as the cut-off value for random plasma glucose (2.7% and 6.9%, p < 0.0001).”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [226]
Cites
Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy
Raman, P., Shepherd, E., Dowswell, T., Middleton, P., & Crowther, C. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011069.pub2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morikawa, M., Sugiyama, T., Hiramatsu, Y., & Sagawa, N.
- Affiliations
- Kansai Medical University (JP)
- Ehime University (JP)
- Okayama City Hospital (JP)
- Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital (JP)
- Venue
- Endocrine Journal
- Publisher
- Japan Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1313-1322
- ISSN
- 0918-8959 (ISSN-L)
- 1348-4540
- OpenAlex
- W4283825865
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Endocrine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM screening, random blood glucose, glucose challenge test, cut-off values, screening incidence, first pregnancy, Japan
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Japan, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review