The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance Implications of Adopting a Customer-Focused Sales Campaign
Abstract
Through field experiments conducted in two business-to-business firms, the authors evaluate the financial and relational consequences of adopting a customer focus in sales campaigns. In both the experiments, salespeople adopting the customer-focused sales campaign coordinated their sales calls with the objective of selling all the products that a customer was predicted to purchase only at the time the customer was expected to purchase. The authors compare this strategy with the current practice in the organization in which salespeople for each product category independently contacted the customers who were expected to purchase in that category without any guidance on the expected timing of customer purchase. The experiments show that adopting a customer-focused sales campaign can significantly increase firm profits and return on investment. The total incremental profits obtained from implementing the customer-focused sales campaign was more than $1 million. High-revenue customers were the source of improvements in the efficiency of marketing contacts, whereas low-revenue customers were the source of improvements in the effectiveness of the marketing contacts. A customer-focused sales campaign also improved the relationship quality between the customer and the firm. This research provides empirical evidence for theoretical expectations of the benefits provided by a customer-focused sales campaign. Organizations can use the field experiments illustrated in this study as a template for implementing the first step in migrating to a customer-centric organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orne, M. T. (1962) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0043424 · Cited by 4,041
Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030 · Cited by 2,151
A Customer Lifetime Value Framework for Customer Selection and Resource Allocation Strategy
Venkatesan, R., & Kumar, V. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.106.42728 · Cited by 948
Self-citationBolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263341 · Cited by 741
Next-product-to-buy models for cross-selling applications
Knott, A., Hayes, A., & Neslin, S. A. (2002) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10038 · Cited by 161
Cited by
Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences
Pansari, A., & Kumar, V. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6 · Cited by 1,758
Self-citationVerbeke, W., Dietz, B., & Verwaal, E. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0211-8 · Cited by 630
Homburg, C., Müller, M., & Klarmann, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.75.2.55 · Cited by 532
Inman, J. J., Winer, R. S., & Ferraro, R. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.19 · Cited by 527
Li, H. (., & Kannan, P. K. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0050 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, V., Venkatesan, R., & Reinartz, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 50-68
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2121934168
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Implications of Adopting a Customer-Focused Sales Campaign. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.72.5.050
- The paper
- Kumar, V., Venkatesan, R., & Reinartz, W. (2008). Performance Implications of Adopting a Customer-Focused Sales Campaign. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.5.050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.