The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does it Make Sense to Use Scents to Enhance Brand Memory?
Abstract
Can pleasant ambient scents enhance consumer memory for branded products? If so, why? The authors examine the effects of ambient scent on recall and recognition of brands in two studies. In the first (i.e., encoding) phase of each study, subjects are asked to evaluate familiar and unfamiliar brands while viewing digital photographs of products on a computer screen; stimulus viewing times are measured covertly on the computer. Ambient scent is manipulated in the experiment room through a diffuser. In the second (i.e., retrieval) phase, conducted 24-hours later, brand recall and recognition accuracy are assessed. In both studies, ambient scent improves both recall and recognition of familiar and unfamiliar brands. This pattern emerges whether or not the scent is congruent with the product category (Study 1), and the enhancement in brand memory is due to the presence of ambient scent during encoding rather than retrieval (Study 2). Although ambient scent apparently did not alter subjects' self-assessed mood or arousal levels, it increased their attention in terms of longer stimulus viewing times. Mediation analyses suggest that the attention mechanism most likely explains why ambient scent improves brand memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
A spreading activation theory of memory.
Anderson, J. R. (1983) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3 · Cited by 2,199
Cited by
The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust
Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.114 · Cited by 609
Servicescape and loyalty intentions: an empirical investigation
Harris, L. C., & Ezeh, C. (2008) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560810852995 · Cited by 361
Wörfel, P., Frentz, F., & Tautu, C. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2020-0510 · Cited by 84
Szocs, C., Kim, Y., Lim, M., Mera, C. A., & Biswas, D. (2023) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2023.11.005 · Cited by 70
Mental health service use among young adults: A communication framework for program development
Munson, M. R., & Jaccard, J. (2018) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0765-y · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-25
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2114123718
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does it Make Sense to Use Scents to Enhance Brand Memory? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.40.1.10.19128
- The paper
- Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S. (2003). Does it Make Sense to Use Scents to Enhance Brand Memory? Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.1.10.19128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.