The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marketing Mass-Customized Products: Striking a Balance between Utility and Complexity
Open accessAbstract
Increasingly, firms allow consumers to mass customize their products. In this study, the authors investigate consumers' evaluations of different mass customization configurations when they are asked to mass customize a product. For example, mass customization configurations may differ in the number of modules that can be mass customized. In the context of mass customization of personal computers, the authors find that mass customization configuration affects the product utility that consumers can achieve in mass customization as well as their perception of mass customization complexity. In turn, product utility and complexity affect the utility that consumers derive from using a certain mass customization configuration. More specifically, product utility has a positive effect and complexity has a negative effect on mass customization utility. The effect of complexity is direct as well as indirect because complexity also lowers product utility. The authors also find that consumers with high levels of product expertise consider mass customization configurations less complex than do consumers with low levels of product expertise and that for more-expert consumers, complexity has a less-negative impact on product utility. The study has important managerial implications for how companies can design their mass customization configuration to increase utility and decrease complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302303001 · Cited by 1,898
Cited by
Digital marketing: a framework, review, and research agenda
Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006 · Cited by 1,707
Decision difficulty in the age of consumer empowerment
Broniarczyk, S. M., & Griffin, J. G. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.003 · Cited by 256
The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy
Dellaert, B. G. C. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0607-4 · Cited by 224
Self-citationExpert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Chinman, M. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., Damschroder, L. J., & Kirchner, J. E. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-39 · Cited by 202
Banker, S., & Khetani, S. (2019) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915619858057 · Cited by 120
Shen, A., & Dwayne Ball, A. (2009) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040910946341 · Cited by 105
Strategic consumer behavior in online hotel booking
Masiero, L., Viglia, G., & Nieto-Garcia, M. (2020) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.102947 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Dellaert, B. G. C., & Stremersch, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-227
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2050716594
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.