Can “Low-Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity?
Open accessAbstract
In this era of increasing obesity and increasing threats of legislation and regulation of food marketing practices, regulatory agencies have pointedly asked how “low-fat” nutrition claims may influence food consumption. The authors develop and test a framework that contends that low-fat nutrition labels increase food intake by (1) increasing perceptions of the appropriate serving size and (2) decreasing consumption guilt. Three studies show that low-fat labels lead all consumers—particularly those who are overweight—to overeat snack foods. Furthermore, salient objective serving-size information (e.g., “Contains 2 Servings”) reduces overeating among guilt-prone, normal-weight consumers but not among overweight consumers. With consumer welfare and corporate profitability in mind, the authors suggest win-win packaging and labeling insights for public policy officials and food marketers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings that emphasizing health qualities can increase consumption seem to be isolated to contexts in which the food is unhealthy and there are no alternative foods to choose from.
“these findings seem to be isolated to contexts in which the food is unhealthy (e.g., cookies, candy, crackers) and there are no alternative foods to choose from”
From Increasing Vegetable Intake by Emphasizing Tasty and Enjoyable Attributes: A Randomized Controlled Multisite Intervention for Taste-Focused Labeling (2019) · cites this paper as Wansink & Chandon, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 47 · Cited by 734
- Authors
- Wansink, B., & Chandon, P.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- INSEAD (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 605-617
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2159310655
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 19.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- obesity, overeating, snack food consumption, food labeling, food marketing regulation, food packaging, consumer welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review