The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marketing's Impact on Firm Value: Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis
Abstract
The interest in the value relevance of marketing investments has given rise to numerous studies on the marketing–finance interface. This study integrates extant research findings and establishes empirical generalizations on marketing's impact on firm value. Specifically, the authors conduct a meta-analysis of prior econometric elasticity estimates of the stock market impact of marketing actions and marketing assets. Analyses based on 488 elasticities drawn from 83 studies reveal a mean elasticity of .04 for advertising expenditure variables and of .54 for marketing asset variables. Among marketing assets, customer-related assets show a higher mean elasticity of .72, compared with .33 for brand-related assets. Further analyses show that advertising elasticities are lower in more concentrated industries and that marketing asset elasticities are higher during recession times. Researchers should also be aware that characteristics of the research design (e.g., the type of firm value metric used, the omission of control variables, or not accounting for endogeneity) may affect the estimation results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work
Fama, E. F. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325486 · Cited by 13,635
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 · Cited by 4,256
Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030 · Cited by 2,151
Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.4.001 · Cited by 823
The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality
Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152193 · Cited by 789
New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity
Bijmolt, T. H. A., Van Heerde, H. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.141.62296 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Edeling, A., & Fischer, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-534
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2195546496
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marketing's Impact on Firm Value: Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmr.14.0046
- The paper
- Edeling, A., & Fischer, M. (2016). Marketing's Impact on Firm Value: Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.