What size of left atrium significantly impairs the success of maze surgery for atrial fibrillation?
Open accessAbstract
A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was in adults with atrial fibrillation (AF), what preoperative size of left atrium impairs maze surgery success in terms of recurrence of AF. Altogether 422 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal. date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Nine of 12 papers found that preoperative left atrial (LA) size was significantly larger in patients who experienced recurrent AF. When left atrial diameter (LAD) was found to be statistically different between sinus conversion and recurrent AF groups the mean LAD was consistently >60 mm in the recurrent AF group, whereas it was <60 mm in all but one of the sinus conversion groups. In terms of a cut-off value for LA size, a left atrial volume index >135 ml/m(2) was found to confer 100% specificity for maze failure and a LAD >60 mm was found to be 100% sensitive for maze failure. A preoperative LAD <48.3 mm was shown in one study to be 100% sensitive for sinus conversion by the maze procedure. Despite much evidence highlighting preoperative LAD as a risk factor for maze failure, relatively few studies seek to define a definitive cut-off value for LA size beyond which the risks of the procedure (such as bleeding, infection or stroke) outweigh the chance of sinus recovery. We conclude that since mean preoperative LAD in AF groups is consistently over 60 mm caution should be exercised when offering these patients the maze procedure. Furthermore, the relationship between preoperative LAD and maze failure appears continuous and so patients should be counselled as to their increased risk of failure the further they deviate from a LAD of 60 mm. There is some evidence for and no available evidence to the contrary that a LAD < 43 mm is associated with complete maze success. Hence, these patients should be offered the maze procedure unless there are alternate strong contraindications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after surgery include left atrial dilatation, older age, >10-year history of atrial fibrillation, and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
“Predictors of AF recurrence after surgery include left atrial dilatation, older age, > 10-year history of AF, and non-paroxysmal AF. [800][801][802][803][804]”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [801]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Sunderland, N., Maruthappu, M., & Nagendran, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nagendran, M.
- Venue
- Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 332-338
- ISSN
- 1569-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-9293
- OpenAlex
- W2166637447
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, left atrium size, left atrial diameter, left atrial volume index, catheter ablation, maze procedure, sinus rhythm restoration, atrial fibrillation recurrence, preoperative risk factors, cut-off values
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Heart Atria, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Evidence-Based Medicine, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review