Cited by 47Probiotics and Fermented FoodsAsthma and respiratory diseasesImmune Response and Inflammation

Probiotics and lung immune responses

Forsythe, Paul·2014·Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the potential for microbe-based therapeutic approaches to asthma and respiratory infection. However, to date, clinical trials of probiotics in the treatment of respiratory disease have met with limited success. It is becoming clear that to identify the true therapeutic potential of microbes we must move away from a purely empirical approach to clinical trials and adopt knowledge-based selection of candidate probiotics strains, dose, and means of administration. Animal models have played a key role in the identification of mechanisms underlying the immunomodulatory capacity of specific bacteria. Microbe-induced changes in dendritic cell phenotype and function appear key to orchestrating the multiple pathways, involving inter alia, T cells, natural killer cells, and alveolar macrophages, associated with the protective effect of probiotics. Moving forward, the development of knowledge-based strategies for microbe-based therapeutics in respiratory disease will be aided by greater understanding of how specific bacterial structural motifs activate unique combinations of pattern recognition receptors on dendritic cells and thus direct desired immune responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1513/annalsats.201306-156mg

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous pre-clinical studies have shown that oral probiotics are capable of positively influencing gut barrier function and systemic immunity, and thus in pneumonia may enhance the host's ability to suppress and clear reproducing lung pathogens.

    “Numerous pre-clinical studies have shown that oral probiotics are capable of positively influencing gut barrier function and systemic immunity, and thus, in the case of pneumonia, may enhance the host’s ability to suppress and clear reproducing lung pathogens as they emerge (Bron et al., 2017) (Forsythe, 2014).”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Forsythe, 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 47

Authors
Forsythe, P.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Forsythe, Paul
Venue
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S33-S37
ISSN
  • 2325-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-6933
OpenAlex
W1967896150
Cited by
47
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
probiotics, lung immunity, asthma, respiratory infections, dendritic cells, immunomodulation, pattern recognition receptors, alveolar macrophages, natural killer cells, T cells, probiotic strain selection
MeSH terms
Asthma, Bifidobacterium, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Lactobacillus, Lung, Respiratory Tract Infections, Probiotics, Respiratory Mucosa, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review