The DOI matches its DataCite record.
On LETS and Time Dollars
Open accessAbstract
A comparative analysis of LETS and Time Dollars seeks to identify their distinctive strengths and shortcomings, makes a plea for collaboration. The piece argues that most of the differences stem from their purpose: LETS is seeking to create an alternative economy to market; Time Dollars are seeking to rebuild what is termed the Core Economy, rooted in family, extended family, neighbors and civil society. While both seek to build community and counter the external costs of the global economy, LETS seeks to do so by returning the world of commerce to a local basis, while Time Dollars expressly seeks to do so by rebuilding the Core Economy, purged of the elements of subordination, discrimination and exploitation that characterized the functioning of that economy in the past. Both have important contributions to make and the challenge is to make sure that future relationships are in cooperation rather than competition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Time banks, originally developed by Edgar Cahn (Cahn and Rowe, 1996; Cahn, 1999, 2001), are agency-based credit systems that enable local communities to support each other and 'call in favours' in exchange for credit obtained by performing social services oneself.”
From The Second Wave of Attention Economics. Attention as a Universal Symbolic Currency on Social Media and beyond (2025) · cites this paper as Cahn, 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heitmayer, M. (2025) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwae035 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Cahn, E. S.
- Corresponding author
- Cahn, Edgar S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Community Currency Research
- Publisher
- International Journal of Community Currency Research
- Published
- 2001-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W6923679959
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Universiteitsbibliotheek EUR
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Solidarity
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Social Sciences and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Anarchism and Radical Politics
- Keywords
- LETS, local exchange systems, alternative economy, community building, civil society, local commerce, anti-globalization, economic cooperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review